Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25800105›Full record

ArticleJournal of substance abuse treatment2015

Evaluation of the current opioid misuse measure among substance use disorder treatment patients.

Lisham Ashrafioun, Amy S B Bohnert, Mary Jannausch, Mark A Ilgen

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of substance abuse treatment, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lisham AshrafiounBowling Green State University, Department of Psychology, 207 Psychology Building, Bowling Green, OH 43403; VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Mental Health Service, 2215 Fuller Rd., Ann Arbor, MI 48105. Electronic address: lisham.ashrafioun@va.gov.
Amy S B BohnertVA Serious Mental Illness Treatment Resource and Evaluation Center (SMITREC), Department of Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Ann Arbor MI, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Rd Building 14, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Rd Building 10, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Mary JannauschVA Serious Mental Illness Treatment Resource and Evaluation Center (SMITREC), Department of Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Ann Arbor MI, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Rd Building 14, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Rd Building 10, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Mark A IlgenVA Serious Mental Illness Treatment Resource and Evaluation Center (SMITREC), Department of Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Ann Arbor MI, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Rd Building 14, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Rd Building 10, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.

Funding

Psychosocial pain management during addictions treatment to improve outcomesR01DA029587 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ILGEN, MARK A. · 2011 to 2015
$2.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA029587NIDA NIH HHS R01DA029587
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) has demonstrated promising psychometric properties among pain clinic and primary care patients. Given the high prevalence of the nonmedical use of prescription opioids among substance use disorder patients, the COMM may also be useful in substance use disorder treatment settings. The purpose of this study was to assess the factor structure and validity of the COMM in a sample of substance use disorder patients. Participants (n = 351) were recruited from a large residential substance use disorder treatment center and completed the COMM and several questionnaires assessing various substance use and health functioning characteristics. Factor analyses yielded a two-factor solution; however, each of the items in the second factor cross-loaded onto the first factor and just one factor was retained. To provide support for this new 11-item COMM, we found that higher scores on this COMM were associated with greater drug use severity, greater endorsement of positive, negative, and pain relief outcome expectancies related to opioid use, increased pain intensity, and decreased physical and mental health functioning. These findings provide initial support for the psychometric properties of this version of the COMM adapted for substance use disorder treatment settings. Given its promising psychometric properties, the 11 items of the COMM to evaluate the nonmedical use of prescription opioids have potential utility among substance use disorder patients. The COMM could be used to examine nonmedical use over the course of treatment and to aid treatment planning. It could also be used in research as an outcome measure.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidPrescription Drug MisuseAdultFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsSubstance-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidCurrent Opioid Misuse MeasurePrescription opioidsSubstance use disorder

Identifiers

PMID25800105
PMCPMC4456230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.