ArticlePloS one2015
Comparative 3D genome structure analysis of the fission and the budding yeast.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disordered C-terminal domain drives spatiotemporal confinement of RNAPII to enhance search for chromatin targets.Nature cell biology · 2024Article
- Disordered C-terminal domain drives spatiotemporal confinement of RNAPII to enhance search for chromatin targets.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Genome Comparisons of the Fission Yeasts Reveal Ancient Collinear Loci Maintained by Natural Selection.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Orc4 spatiotemporally stabilizes centromeric chromatin.Genome research · 2021Article
- Quantitative Analysis of Spatial Distributions of All tRNA Genes in Budding Yeast.Biophysical journal · 2020Article
- Nuclear Mechanics in the Fission Yeast.Cells · 2019Review
- 4Cin: A computational pipeline for 3D genome modeling and virtual Hi-C analyses from 4C data.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Article
- The biology and polymer physics underlying large-scale chromosome organization.Traffic (Copenhagen, Denmark) · 2018Review
- Heterogeneous Spatial Distribution of Transcriptional Activity in Budding Yeast Nuclei.Biophysical journal · 2017Article
- Chrom3D: three-dimensional genome modeling from Hi-C and nuclear lamin-genome contacts.Genome biology · 2017Article
- Hi-C-constrained physical models of human chromosomes recover functionally-related properties of genome organization.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Decoding the principles underlying the frequency of association with nucleoli for RNA polymerase III-transcribed genes in budding yeast.Molecular biology of the cell · 2016Article
- Mining 3D genome structure populations identifies major factors governing the stability of regulatory communities.Nature communications · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We studied the 3D structural organization of the fission yeast genome, which emerges from the tethering of heterochromatic regions in otherwise randomly configured chromosomes represented as flexible polymer chains in an nuclear environment. This model is sufficient to explain in a statistical manner many experimentally determined distinctive features of the fission yeast genome, including chromatin interaction patterns from Hi-C experiments and the co-locations of functionally related and co-expressed genes, such as genes expressed by Pol-III. Our findings demonstrate that some previously described structure-function correlations can be explained as a consequence of random chromatin collisions driven by a few geometric constraints (mainly due to centromere-SPB and telomere-NE tethering) combined with the specific gene locations in the chromosome sequence. We also performed a comparative analysis between the fission and budding yeast genome structures, for which we previously detected a similar organizing principle. However, due to the different chromosome sizes and numbers, substantial differences are observed in the 3D structural genome organization between the two species, most notably in the nuclear locations of orthologous genes, and the extent of nuclear territories for genes and chromosomes. However, despite those differences, remarkably, functional similarities are maintained, which is evident when comparing spatial clustering of functionally related genes in both yeasts. Functionally related genes show a similar spatial clustering behavior in both yeasts, even though their nuclear locations are largely different between the yeast species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.