Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25799239›Full record

ArticleNature communications2015

Analysing human neural stem cell ontogeny by consecutive isolation of Notch active neural progenitors.

Reuven Edri, Yakey Yaffe, Michael J Ziller, Naresh Mutukula, Rotem Volkman, Eyal David, Jasmine Jacob-Hirsch, Hagar Malcov, Carmit Levy, Gideon Rechavi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Organoids: a novel modality in disease modeling.Bio-design and manufacturing · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Reuven EdriDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.
Yakey YaffeDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.
Michael J Ziller1] Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA [2] Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.
Naresh MutukulaDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.
Rotem VolkmanDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.
Eyal DavidDepartment of Cell Research and Immunology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.
Jasmine Jacob-Hirsch1] Cancer Research Center, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer 52621, Israel [2] Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.
Hagar MalcovDepartment of Human Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.
Carmit LevyDepartment of Human Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.
Gideon Rechavi1] Cancer Research Center, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer 52621, Israel [2] Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.
Irit Gat-ViksDepartment of Cell Research and Immunology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.
Alexander Meissner1] Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA [2] Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.
Yechiel ElkabetzDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decoding heterogeneity of pluripotent stem cell (PSC)-derived neural progeny is fundamental for revealing the origin of diverse progenitors, for defining their lineages, and for identifying fate determinants driving transition through distinct potencies. Here we have prospectively isolated consecutively appearing PSC-derived primary progenitors based on their Notch activation state. We first isolate early neuroepithelial cells and show their broad Notch-dependent developmental and proliferative potential. Neuroepithelial cells further yield successive Notch-dependent functional primary progenitors, from early and midneurogenic radial glia and their derived basal progenitors, to gliogenic radial glia and adult-like neural progenitors, together recapitulating hallmarks of neural stem cell (NSC) ontogeny. Gene expression profiling reveals dynamic stage-specific transcriptional patterns that may link development of distinct progenitor identities through Notch activation. Our observations provide a platform for characterization and manipulation of distinct progenitor cell types amenable for developing streamlined neural lineage specification paradigms for modelling development in health and disease.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalCell LineCerebral CortexGene Expression ProfilingHumansMicroscopy, ConfocalNeural PlateNeural Stem CellsNeurogliaNeuronsPluripotent Stem CellsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReceptors, NotchRNA, MessengerReceptors, NotchRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID25799239
PMCPMC4383005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.