Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25799168›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2015

Mass drug administration for trachoma: how long is not long enough?

Violeta Jimenez, Huub C Gelderblom, Rebecca Mann Flueckiger, Paul M Emerson, Danny Haddad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trachoma.BMJ clinical evidence · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Violeta JimenezHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America; International Trachoma Initiative, Task Force for Global Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America; Global Ophthalmology Emory, Emory Eye Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Huub C GelderblomInternational Trachoma Initiative, Task Force for Global Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Rebecca Mann FlueckigerInternational Trachoma Initiative, Task Force for Global Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Paul M EmersonInternational Trachoma Initiative, Task Force for Global Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Danny HaddadHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America; Global Ophthalmology Emory, Emory Eye Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
International Trachoma Initiative · USEmory University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlinding trachoma is targeted for elimination by 2020 using the SAFE strategy (Surgery, Antibiotics, Facial cleanliness, and Environmental improvements). Annual mass drug administration (MDA) with azithromycin is a cornerstone of this strategy. If baseline prevalence of clinical signs of trachomatous inflammation - follicular among 1-9 year-olds (TF1-9) is ≥ 10% but <30%, the World Health Organization guidelines are for at least 3 annual MDAs; if ≥ 30%, 5. We assessed the likelihood of achieving the global elimination target of TF1-9 <5% at 3 and 5 year evaluations using program reports. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe used the International Trachoma Initiative's prevalence and treatment database. Of 283 cross-sectional survey pairs with baseline and follow-up data, MDA was conducted in 170 districts. Linear and logistic regression modeling was applied to these to investigate the effect of MDA on baseline prevalence. Reduction to <5% was less likely, though not impossible, at higher baseline TF1-9 prevalences. Increased number of annual MDAs, as well as no skipped MDAs, were significant predictors of reduced TF1-9 at follow-up. The probability of achieving the <5% target was <50% for areas with ≥ 30% TF1-9 prevalence at baseline, even with 7 or more continuous annual MDAs.

conclusionsNumber of annual MDAs alone appears insufficient to predict program progress; more information on the effects of baseline prevalence, coverage, and underlying environmental and hygienic conditions is needed. Programs should not skip MDAs, and at prevalences >30%, 7 or more annual MDAs may be required to achieve the target. There are five years left before the 2020 deadline to eliminate blinding trachoma. Low endemic settings are poised to succeed in their elimination goals. However, newly-identified high prevalence districts warrant immediate inclusion in the global program. Intensified application of the SAFE strategy is needed in order to guarantee blinding trachoma elimination by 2020.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDisease EradicationEnvironmentHumansHygieneInfantMalePre-Exposure ProphylaxisPrevalenceRegression AnalysisTrachomaWorld Health OrganizationAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycin

Identifiers

PMID25799168
PMCPMC4370651
OpenAlexW2048269466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.