Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25798856›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

No evidence of enemy release in pathogen and microbial communities of common wasps (Vespula vulgaris) in their native and introduced range.

Philip J Lester, Peter J Bosch, Monica A M Gruber, Eugene A Kapp, Lifeng Peng, Evan C Brenton-Rule, Joe Buchanan, Wlodek L Stanislawek, Michael Archer, Juan C Corley and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Philip J LesterCentre for Biodiversity and Restoration Ecology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Peter J BoschCentre for Biodiscovery, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand; Department of Biology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America.
Monica A M GruberCentre for Biodiversity and Restoration Ecology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Eugene A KappWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Lifeng PengCentre for Biodiscovery, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Evan C Brenton-RuleCentre for Biodiversity and Restoration Ecology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Joe BuchananCentre for Biodiversity and Restoration Ecology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Wlodek L StanislawekInvestigation and Diagnostic Centre-Wallaceville, Ministry for Primary Industries, Upper Hutt, New Zealand.
Michael ArcherYork St. John University, Lord Mayor's Walk, York, England.
Juan C CorleyCONICET and Grupo de Ecologia de Poblaciones de Insectos, INTA EEA Bariloche, Argentina.
Maitè MasciocchiCONICET and Grupo de Ecologia de Poblaciones de Insectos, INTA EEA Bariloche, Argentina.
Annette Van OystaeyenLaboratory of Socio-Ecology and Social Evolution, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Tom WenseleersLaboratory of Socio-Ecology and Social Evolution, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When invasive species move to new environments they typically experience population bottlenecks that limit the probability that pathogens and parasites are also moved. The invasive species may thus be released from biotic interactions that can be a major source of density-dependent mortality, referred to as enemy release. We examined for evidence of enemy release in populations of the common wasp (Vespula vulgaris), which attains high densities and represents a major threat to biodiversity in its invaded range. Mass spectrometry proteomic methods were used to compare the microbial communities in wasp populations in the native (Belgium and England) and invaded range (Argentina and New Zealand). We found no evidence of enemy release, as the number of microbial taxa was similar in both the introduced and native range. However, some evidence of distinctiveness in the microbial communities was observed between countries. The pathogens observed were similar to a variety of taxa observed in honey bees. These taxa included Nosema, Paenibacillus, and Yersina spp. Genomic methods confirmed a diversity of Nosema spp., Actinobacteria, and the Deformed wing and Kashmir bee viruses. We also analysed published records of bacteria, viruses, nematodes and fungi from both V. vulgaris and the related invader V. germanica. Thirty-three different microorganism taxa have been associated with wasps including Kashmir bee virus and entomophagous fungi such as Aspergillus flavus. There was no evidence that the presence or absence of these microorganisms was dependent on region of wasp samples (i.e. their native or invaded range). Given the similarity of the wasp pathogen fauna to that from honey bees, the lack of enemy release in wasp populations is probably related to spill-over or spill-back from bees and other social insects. Social insects appear to form a reservoir of generalist parasites and pathogens, which makes the management of wasp and bee disease difficult.

Indexed as

EcosystemMicrobiotaAnimal DistributionAnimalsIntroduced SpeciesWasps

Identifiers

PMID25798856
PMCPMC4370511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.