Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25798333›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2015

Combination of agomelatine and bupropion for treatment-resistant depression: results from a chart review study including a matched control group.

Kurt-Wolfram Sühs, Christoph Correll, Christian K Eberlein, Refik Pul, Helge Frieling, Stefan Bleich, Kai G Kahl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kurt-Wolfram SühsDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany.
Christoph CorrellDepartment of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital Glen Oaks, New York ; Department of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Hofstra North Shore Long Island Jewish School of Medicine Hempstead, New York ; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine Bronx, New York.
Christian K EberleinDepartment of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany.
Refik PulDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany.
Helge FrielingDepartment of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany.
Stefan BleichDepartment of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany.
Kai G KahlDepartment of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEHofstra University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough a growing selection of antidepressants is available, a significant number of patients do not reach clinical remission, despite multiple trials. Data concerning the efficacy and safety of combination therapies with newer antidepressants are limited.

methodsFifteen inpatients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD), defined as Beck Depression Inventory-2 (BDI-2) scores >14 despite treatment with adequate doses of ≥ 1 antidepressant classes for ≥ 6 weeks, were treated with agomelatine plus bupropion for ≥6 weeks, and compared to 15 patients on antidepressant monotherapy with TRD matched on age, sex, and TRD stage based on retrospective chart review. The primary outcome was change in BDI-2 scores. Secondary outcomes included treatment response (BDI-2 score decrease by ≥ 50%), remission (BDI-2 score <13), routinely measured cardiometabolic parameters and adverse effects.

resultsAfter a mean of 6 ± 1 weeks, BDI-2 scores decreased by 20.3 ± 5.6 points in the combination group compared to 12.5 ± 15.1 points in the monotherapy group (P = 0.073; Cohen's d = 0.7). Altogether, 73.3% in the combination group responded compared to 53.3% on monotherapy (P = 0.27). About 60.0% on combination therapy reached remission compared to 40% on monotherapy (P = 0.28), a difference equivalent to a number-needed-to-treat = 4. Treatment response was independent of the degree of TRD (P = 0.27). Bupropion-agomelatine cotreatment was well tolerated and laboratory adverse effect parameters were not altered.

conclusionDespite the small sample and uncontrolled study design, the good remission rate in TRD patients receiving agomelatine plus bupropion, particularly in comparison to the monotherapy group, indicates that this combination treatment should be explored further as a potentially promising strategy for patients with TRD.

Indexed as

AcetamidesAdultAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationBupropionDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedNaphthalenesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAcetamidesagomelatineAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationBupropionHypnotics and SedativesNaphthalenesAgomelatinebupropiontreatment-resistant depression

Identifiers

PMID25798333
PMCPMC4356843
OpenAlexW2053039572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.