Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25798078›Full record

ArticleBiological theory

The Comet Cometh: Evolving Developmental Systems.

Johannes Jaeger, Manfred Laubichler, Werner Callebaut

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological theory. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A shark-inspired general model of tooth morphogenesis unveils developmental asymmetries in phenotype transitions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  2. The emerging structure of the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis: where does Evo-Devo fit in?Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2018
    Article
  3. Deep homology in the age of next-generation sequencing.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Johannes JaegerEMBL/CRG Research Unit in Systems Biology, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Barcelona, Spain ; Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain ; Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Manfred LaubichlerSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ USA ; Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM USA ; Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA USA ; Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin, Germany ; The KLI Institute, Klosterneuburg, Austria.
Werner CallebautThe KLI Institute, Klosterneuburg, Austria.
Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a recent opinion piece, Denis Duboule has claimed that the increasing shift towards systems biology is driving evolutionary and developmental biology apart, and that a true reunification of these two disciplines within the framework of evolutionary developmental biology (EvoDevo) may easily take another 100 years. He identifies methodological, epistemological, and social differences as causes for this supposed separation. Our article provides a contrasting view. We argue that Duboule's prediction is based on a one-sided understanding of systems biology as a science that is only interested in functional, not evolutionary, aspects of biological processes. Instead, we propose a research program for an evolutionary systems biology, which is based on local exploration of the configuration space in evolving developmental systems. We call this approach-which is based on reverse engineering, simulation, and mathematical analysis-the natural history of configuration space. We discuss a number of illustrative examples that demonstrate the past success of local exploration, as opposed to global mapping, in different biological contexts. We argue that this pragmatic mode of inquiry can be extended and applied to the mathematical analysis of the developmental repertoire and evolutionary potential of evolving developmental mechanisms and that evolutionary systems biology so conceived provides a pragmatic epistemological framework for the EvoDevo synthesis.

Indexed as

Dynamical systems theoryEpistemologyEvolutionary developmental biology (EvoDevo)Evolutionary systems biologyNatural history of configuration spaceScientific perspectivism

Identifiers

PMID25798078
PMCPMC4357653
OpenAlexW1994662603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.