Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25798070›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2015

Drug concentrations in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid of patients treated with cefoperazone/sulbactam after craniotomy.

Qiang Wang, Yuanxing Wu, Biyao Chen, Jianxin Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Drug concentrations in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid of patients treated with norvancomycin after craniotomy.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2017
    Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qiang WangIntensive Care Unit, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050 PR China.
Yuanxing WuIntensive Care Unit, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050 PR China.
Biyao ChenDepartment of Emergency, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050 PR China.
Jianxin ZhouIntensive Care Unit, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050 PR China.
Capital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo identify changes in cefoperazone/sulbactam penetration into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) after craniotomy and to investigate preliminarily whether cefoperazone/sulbactam CSF concentration can reach therapeutic level when administered intravenously after neurosurgical operation.

methodsNeurosurgical patients with an indwelling ventricular drainage pipe who received prophylactic cefoperazone/sulbactam for the treatment of intracranial infection were received a cefoperazone/sulbactam 2:1, 3.0-g infusion for 3 hours every 6 hours for 24 h. Venous blood and CSF specimens were collected to determine cefoperazone/sulbactam concentrations.

resultsThe cefoperazone and sulbactam concentrations in serum were highest at the second hour (237.54 ± 336.72 mg/L and 66.52 ± 80.38 mg/L, respectively) and then decreased. The cefoperazone and sulbactam concentrations in CSF were highest at the 4th hour (39.22 ± 75.55 mg/L and 6.24 ± 8.35 mg/L, respectively) and then decreased. CSF penetration measured by the ratio of peak concentrations (CSF/serum) was 8.6% ± 7.2% for cefoperazone and 13.5% ± 11.9% for sulbactam, CSF penetration measured by the ratio of trough concentrations (CSF/serum) was 13.4% ± 5.3% for cefoperazone and 106.5% ± 87.5% for sulbactam. CSF penetration represented by the ratio of area under the curve (AUC) of CSF and serum was 14.5% for cefoperazone and 22.6% for sulbactam. Neurosurgical impairment of the blood-brain barrier may improve the CSF penetration of these drugs, but it is difficult to reach the MIC90 of resistant bacteria. If single intravenous administration time was extended to 3 hours, the serum concentrations of drugs were able to meet the PK/PD standard (T> MIC%> 50%) for treating common, highly resistant bacteria.

conclusionsThe CSF penetration of cefoperazone/sulbactam may be enhanced after neurosurgical impairment of the blood-brain barrier. This study is a pilot research of cefoperazone/sulbactam using in neurosurgical individuals, However, it needs to be confirmed by further large-scale studies.

Indexed as

CraniotomyAdultAgedAnti-Infective Agents, UrinaryCefoperazoneDrug CombinationsFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSerum Bactericidal TestSulbactamTime FactorsAnti-Infective Agents, UrinaryCefoperazoneDrug CombinationsSulbactamCefoperazoneCerebrospinal fluidConcentrationSerumSulbactam

Identifiers

PMID25798070
PMCPMC4369365
OpenAlexW2089354800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.