Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25797960›Full record

ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2015

Breast Cancer Update 2014 - Focus on the Patient and the Tumour.

N Maass, F Schütz, P A Fasching, T Fehm, W Janni, S Kümmel, H-C Kolberg, D Lüftner, M Wallwiener, M P Lux

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04030728 (A Randomized, Controlled Study of Standardized Patient Coaching Versus Patient Management According to Local Practice for Patients With Hormone Receptor Positive HER2 Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04030728 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized, Controlled Study of Standardized Patient Coaching Versus Patient Management According to Local Practice for Patients With Hormone Receptor Positive HER2 Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib

TypeobservationalSponsorOnco Medical Consult GmbHRan2020 to 2021Enrolled212ConditionsMetastatic Breast Cancer, Advanced Breast Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

N MaassDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen.
F SchützFrauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg.
P A FaschingDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen.
T FehmDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf.
W JanniFrauenklinik, Klinikum der Universität Ulm, Ulm.
S KümmelBrustzentrum, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Evang. Huyssens-Stiftung/Knappschaft GmbH, Essen.
H-C KolbergKlinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop.
D LüftnerMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin.
M WallwienerFrauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg.
M P LuxDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DEKliniken Essen-Mitte · DEMarienhospital Bottrop · DEUniversitätsklinikum Aachen · DEUniversität Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The therapy for patients with breast cancer has developed markedly in the past ten years. Our understanding of the molecular biology of tumours and the characteristics of the patients has shaped the recent advances. In this review we present the latest knowledge about the therapy for breast cancer. There are new tests and options not only in the field of anti-HER2 therapy but also in the management of triple negative and hormone receptor-positive patients. Comprehension of prognosis and therapeutic response to chemotherapies is little by little helping to define patient groups who will not respond to chemotherapy or who do not need treatment because their prognosis is extremely good. In the field of anti-HER2 therapy, work is continuing on the development of drugs suitable for and able to overcome trastuzumab resistance. For hormone receptor-positive cancers, we now have a better understanding of which therapy groups will benefit from which anti-endocrine drugs, and which will be able to overcome a possible resistance (treatment of the PI3K pathways, inhibition of the cell cycle). Molecular tests are still being evaluated with regard to the clinical situations in which they may have the greatest relevance for therapeutic decision-making; however, evidence is also increasing as to the fields in which good predictions for the prognosis can be obtained. On the whole, more work is needed to promote our understanding of the new developments in diagnostics and therapy and to involve both physicians and patients equally in the procedures.

Indexed as

breast cancerchemotherapyhormonal therapy

Identifiers

PMID25797960
PMCPMC4361168
OpenAlexW2331973454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.