ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2015
Big data in medical science--a biostatistical view.
Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- What have we learned in minimally invasive colorectal surgery from NSQIP and NIS large databases? A systematic review.International journal of colorectal disease · 2018Pooled it
- [The pitfalls of lung cancer coding practices based on the evaluation of the National Cancer Registry].Magyar onkologia · 2024Article
- Bibliometric Analysis of Hotspots and Frontiers of Immunotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Machine learning as the new approach in understanding biomarkers of suicidal behavior.Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences · 2021Review
- Big data and artificial intelligence in future patient management. How is it all started? Where are we at now? Quo tendimus?Advances in laboratory medicine · 2020Review
- Brief introduction of medical database and data mining technology in big data era.Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2020Review
- Medical Robotics in Bone Fracture Reduction Surgery: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Guidelines and recommendations for ensuring Good Epidemiological Practice (GEP): a guideline developed by the German Society for Epidemiology.European journal of epidemiology · 2019Article
- Reliability of Paper-Based Routine Documentation in Psychiatric Inpatient Care and Recommendations for Further Improvement.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2019Article
- A genomic data mining pipeline for 15 species of the genusEMBnet.journal · 2019Article
- A new unbiased and highly automated approach to find new prognostic markers in preclinical research.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2019Article
- Article
- Article
- Medical big data: promise and challenges.Kidney research and clinical practice · 2017Article
- A data analysis framework for biomedical big data: Application on mesoderm differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells.PloS one · 2017Article
- Nature and Consequences of Biological Reductionism for the Immunological Study of Infectious Diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2017Review
- Big data for bipolar disorder.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2016Review
- How can Big Data Analytics Support People-Centred and Integrated Health Services: A Scoping Review.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInexpensive techniques for measurement and data storage now enable medical researchers to acquire far more data than can conveniently be analyzed by traditional methods. The expression "big data" refers to quantities on the order of magnitude of a terabyte (1012 bytes); special techniques must be used to evaluate such huge quantities of data in a scientifically meaningful way. Whether data sets of this size are useful and important is an open question that currently confronts medical science.
methodsIn this article, we give illustrative examples of the use of analytical techniques for big data and discuss them in the light of a selective literature review. We point out some critical aspects that should be considered to avoid errors when large amounts of data are analyzed.
resultsMachine learning techniques enable the recognition of potentially relevant patterns. When such techniques are used, certain additional steps should be taken that are unnecessary in more traditional analyses; for example, patient characteristics should be differentially weighted. If this is not done as a preliminary step before similarity detection, which is a component of many data analysis operations, characteristics such as age or sex will be weighted no higher than any one out of 10 000 gene expression values. Experience from the analysis of conventional observational data sets can be called upon to draw conclusions about potential causal effects from big data sets.
conclusionBig data techniques can be used, for example, to evaluate observational data derived from the routine care of entire populations, with clustering methods used to analyze therapeutically relevant patient subgroups. Such analyses can provide complementary information to clinical trials of the classic type. As big data analyses become more popular, various statistical techniques for causality analysis in observational data are becoming more widely available. This is likely to be of benefit to medical science, but specific adaptations will have to be made according to the requirements of the applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.