Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25796987›Full record

ArticleExpert review of anti-infective therapy2015

A long-lasting, single-dose nasal vaccine for Ebola: a practical armament for an outbreak with significant global impact.

Kristina Jonsson-Schmunk, Maria A Croyle

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Expert review of anti-infective therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A review on the antagonist Ebola: A prophylactic approach.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2017
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kristina Jonsson-SchmunkDivision of Pharmaceutics, University of Texas at Austin, College of Pharmacy, 2409 W University Ave, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Maria A Croyle

Funding

Evaluation of Protective Immunity After Mucosal Vaccination Against Ebola VirusU01AI078045 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI CROYLE, MARIA A · 2008 to 2012
$2.5M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI078045NIAID NIH HHS U01AI078045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to the severity and scale of the 2014 Ebola outbreak, several experimental vaccines were granted fast-track status for clinical testing. Although they may provide long-lasting protection from Ebola, they are, in their current states, far from optimal for populations that need them the most. In this context, nasal immunization addresses the: immune response required at the mucosa where Ebola initiates infection; needs of a population in terms of cost and compliance; and potency of each platform as they contain viruses that naturally infect the respiratory tract. Understanding the attributes of nasal immunization and its application will lead to potent vaccines that can effectively end Ebola and other emerging infectious diseases in developing and industrialized countries.

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalEbola VaccinesEbolavirusGlobal HealthHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaHumansEbola Vaccinesadenovirusclinical trialdeveloping countryEbolaformulationnasal vaccineVSV

Identifiers

PMID25796987
PMCPMC4716993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.