Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25796972›Full record

ArticleAntiviral research2015

Evaluation of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus in vitro inhibition by chloroquine and chlorpromazine, two FDA approved molecules.

O Ferraris, M Moroso, O Pernet, S Emonet, A Ferrier Rembert, G Paranhos-Baccalà, C N Peyrefitte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antiviral research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. An update on emerging therapeutics to combat COVID-19.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

O FerrarisInstitut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées, Unité de Virologie, Lyon, France.
M MorosoFondation Mérieux, Laboratoire des Pathogènes Émergents, Lyon, France.
O PernetUnité de Virologie Humaine - INSERM U758, Lyon, France.
S EmonetInstitut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées, Unité de Virologie, Lyon, France.
A Ferrier RembertInstitut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées, Unité de Virologie, Lyon, France.
G Paranhos-BaccalàFondation Mérieux, Laboratoire des Pathogènes Émergents, Lyon, France.
C N PeyrefitteInstitut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées, Unité de Virologie, Lyon, France; Fondation Mérieux, Laboratoire des Pathogènes Émergents, Lyon, France.
Institut de Virologie · FRFondation Mérieux · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic virus (CCHFV) causes hemorrhagic fever with high case mortality rates and is endemic in south-eastern Europe, Africa, and Asia. The limited catalog of specific treatment, highlight the necessity to look for additional therapeutic solutions. Previous experiments suggested that CCHFV enters the cells via a clathrin dependent pathway. Therefore, we have evaluated the potential anti-CCHFV activity of several molecules targeting this entry possibility. We identified two molecules chloroquine and chlorpromazine. Neutralization and virus yield reduction assays were tested in Vero E6 and Huh7 cells on two different CCHFV strains. Several combinations, including ribavirin, were assayed to test a potential synergistic effect. The two molecules inhibited CCHFV, and depending on the virus and the cell lines, the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values for chloroquine and chlorpromazine ranged from 28 to 43 and 10.8-15.7 μM, respectively. Time-of-addition studies demonstrated that these molecules had a direct effect on CCHFV infectivity and spread. The antiviral activity of the two molecules was still effective even when added up to 6h post-infection and up to 24h. The selectivity index ranging from 3 to 35 lead us to evaluate combinations with ribavirin. Combinations of ribavirin and chloroquine or chlorpromazine were synergistic against CCHFV. Though the low chlorpromazine selectivity index suggests the need for a chemical improvement, our present study highlights chloroquine as the main drug having the potential for drug repurposing.

Indexed as

Drug RepositioningAnimalsAntiviral AgentsCell LineChloroquineChlorpromazineDrug SynergismHemorrhagic Fever Virus, Crimean-CongoHumansInhibitory Concentration 50Microbial Sensitivity TestsRibavirinVirus InternalizationAntiviral AgentsChloroquineChlorpromazineRibavirinAntiviralChloroquineChlorpromazineCrimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virusRibavirin

Identifiers

PMID25796972
PMCPMC7113845
OpenAlexW2030140401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.