Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25796597›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2015

A needs assessment of health information technology for improving care coordination in three leading patient-centered medical homes.

Joshua E Richardson, Joshua R Vest, Cori M Green, Lisa M Kern, Rainu Kaushal, HITEC Investigators

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Golden opportunities for clinical decision support in an era of team-based healthcare.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Technology Solutions to Support Care Continuity in Home Care: A Focus Group Study.Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joshua E RichardsonDepartment of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, NY, NY Center for Healthcare Informatics and Policy, Weill Cornell Medical College, NY, NY Health Information Technology Evaluation Collaborative (HITEC), NY, NY jor2032@med.cornell.edu.
Joshua R VestDepartment of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, NY, NY Center for Healthcare Informatics and Policy, Weill Cornell Medical College, NY, NY Health Information Technology Evaluation Collaborative (HITEC), NY, NY.
Cori M GreenDepartment of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medical College, NY, NY.
Lisa M KernDepartment of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, NY, NY Center for Healthcare Informatics and Policy, Weill Cornell Medical College, NY, NY Health Information Technology Evaluation Collaborative (HITEC), NY, NY.
Rainu KaushalDepartment of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, NY, NY Center for Healthcare Informatics and Policy, Weill Cornell Medical College, NY, NY Health Information Technology Evaluation Collaborative (HITEC), NY, NY.
HITEC Investigators
Cornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe investigated ways that patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs) are currently using health information technology (IT) for care coordination and what types of health IT are needed to improve care coordination. MATERIALS AND

methodsA multi-disciplinary team of researchers conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with 28 participants from 3 PCMHs in the United States. Participants included administrators and clinicians from PCMHs, electronic health record (EHR) and health information exchange (HIE) representatives, and policy makers.

resultsParticipants identified multiple barriers to care coordination using current health IT tools. We identified five areas in which health IT can improve care coordination in PCMHs: 1) monitoring patient populations, 2) notifying clinicians and other staff when specific patients move across care settings, 3) collaborating around patients, 4) reporting activities, and 5) interoperability. To accomplish these tasks, many participants described using homegrown care coordination systems separate from EHRs. DISCUSSION: The participants in this study have resources, experience, and expertise with using health IT for care coordination, yet they still identified multiple areas for improvement. We hypothesize that focusing health IT development in the five areas we identified can enable more effective care coordination. Key findings from this work are that homegrown systems apart from EHRs are currently used to support care coordination and, also, that reporting tools are key components of care coordination.

conclusionsNew health IT that enables monitoring, notifying, collaborating, reporting, and interoperability would enhance care coordination within PCMHs beyond what current health IT enables.

Indexed as

Medical InformaticsPatient Care ManagementElectronic Health RecordsHealth Care SurveysHealth Information ExchangeHumansInterviews as TopicNeeds AssessmentPatient-Centered CareUnited Statescare coordinationelectronic health recordshealth information technology policyinformatics research

Identifiers

PMID25796597
PMCPMC11737642
OpenAlexW2163789738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.