Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25796510›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2015

The pharmacokinetics of methamphetamine self-administration in male and female rats.

Alessandra Milesi-Hallé, Michael D Hambuchen, Donald E McMillan, S Michael Owens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Effect of Bile Duct Ligation-induced Liver Dysfunction on Methamphetamine Pharmacokinetics and Locomotor Activity in Rats.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alessandra Milesi-HalléDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA. Electronic address: milesihalle@comcast.net.
Michael D HambuchenDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA. Electronic address: hambuchenmichaeld@uams.edu.
Donald E McMillanDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA. Electronic address: demamcmillan@comcast.net.
S Michael OwensDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA. Electronic address: mowens@uams.edu.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · US

Funding

Arkansas Center for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR000039 · NCATS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI BECK, CORNELIA MARIE, JAMES, LAURA P · 2012 to 2014
$10.0M
Translational Training in AddictionT32DA022981 · NIDA · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI Melissa Jean Zielinski · 2009 to 2026
$6.1M
ANTIBODY-BASED THERAPY FOR METHAMPHETAMINE ABUSER01DA011560 · NIDA · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI OWENS, SAMUEL MICHAEL · 1998 to 2008
$3.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000039NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000039NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA011560NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA11560NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA022981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBecause methamphetamine (METH) pharmacokinetics after single iv doses show significant differences between male and female rats, we hypothesized that pharmacokinetic differences in METH disposition could be a contributing factor to the patterns of METH self-administration behaviors in rats.

methodsFor the studies, we used a passive (non-contingent) METH dosing schedule consisting of 27 METH iv bolus injections (0.048mg/kg) over 2h derived from a previous active (contingent) METH self-administration behavioral study in male rats. After METH dosing of male and female Sprague-Dawley rats (n=5/group), METH and amphetamine serum concentrations were determined by LC-MS/MS. Pharmacokinetic analysis, including predictive mathematical simulations of the data, was then conducted.

resultsMale and female rats achieved relatively stable METH serum concentrations within 20min, which remained constant from 20 to 120min. While not statistically different, METH clearance and volume of distribution values for females were 25% and 33% lower (respectively) than males. Linear regression analysis of predicted METH concentrations from pharmacokinetic simulations versus observed concentrations showed a substantially better correlation with male data than female data (r(2)=0.71 vs. 0.56; slope=0.95 vs. 0.45, respectively). At 120min, the time of predicted peak METH serum concentrations, female values were 42% higher than expected, while male values were within 3%.

conclusionsUnlike METH male pharmacokinetic data, the female data was less predictable during multiple METH administrations and produced overall higher than expected METH concentrations. These findings demonstrate that METH pharmacokinetics could contribute to differences in METH self-administration behaviors in rats.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalFemaleMaleMethamphetamineRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySelf AdministrationMethamphetamineMethamphetaminePharmacokineticsRatsSelf-administrationSex differences

Identifiers

PMID25796510
PMCPMC4387073
OpenAlexW1996608017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.