ArticleThe Journal of membrane biology2015
Content Delivery of Lipidic Nanovesicles in Electropermeabilized Cells.
Article in The Journal of membrane biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lipidic nanovesicles (the so-called liposomes) were among the one of the earliest forms of nanovectors. One of their limits was our lack of knowledge on the delivery pathway of their content to the target cell cytoplasm. In most models, it appears to be linked to endocytotic transfer. Their direct content delivery can be enhanced by electric field pulses applied to a cell liposomes mixture. The optimal form for liposomes was shown to be large unilamellar vesicles (LUV). The present communication describes an optimization to enhance the delivery. When lipidic nanovesicles (LUVs) are electrostatically brought in contact with electropermeabilized cells by a salt bridge, their content is delivered into the cytoplasm of electropermeabilized cells. The PEF parameters are selected to affect specifically the cells leaving the vesicles unaffected. Cell viability is positively affected by the treatment. High-field short pulses are more efficient than low-field long pulses. A homogeneous cytoplasm labeling is observed under digitized videomicroscopy. The process is a content mixing, not an endocytotic pathway. The lipidic composition of the LUV should contain charged lipids (phosphatidylserine), fusion promoting lipids (phosphatidylethanolamine), and cholesterol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.