Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25796454›Full record

ArticleBehavioural processes2015

Comparing hyperbolic, delay-amount sensitivity and present-bias models of delay discounting.

Suzanne H Mitchell, Vanessa B Wilson, Sarah L Karalunas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural processes, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Impulsivity in cerebellar ataxia: an online, multidimensional assessment.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Effort-Related Decision-Making in ADHD.Journal of psychiatry and brain science · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Clinical models of decision making in addiction.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2018
    Review
  18. A COMPARISON OF MAZUR'SThe Psychological record · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Suzanne H MitchellDepartment of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA. Electronic address: mitchesu@ohsu.edu.
Vanessa B WilsonDepartment of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Sarah L KaralunasDepartment of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.

Funding

Translational measures of risk for excessive alcohol consumptionP60AA010760 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Suzanne S. Fei · 2006 to 2026
$34.5M
THERMAL AND METABOLIC DYSFUNCTION DURING WITHDRAWALP50AA010760 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI CRABBE, JOHN C. · 1996 to 2005
$10.7M
ADHD heterogeneity, mechanisms, and risk profileR37MH059105 · NIMH · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI NIGG, JOEL T · 2014 to 2023
$7.0M
NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL AND FAMILIAL MARKERS FOR CHILD ADHDR01MH059105 · NIMH · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI NIGG, JOEL T · 1999 to 2012
$3.3M
Interactions between impulsivity and cigarette smokingR01DA015543 · NIDA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI MITCHELL, SUZANNE H · 2003 to 2007
$1.1M
Exercise-induced changes in impulsivity and cocaine self-administrationR03DA027580 · NIDA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI MITCHELL, SUZANNE H · 2009 to 2011
$568k
Imaging temporal discounting in smokers and nonsmokersR03DA024195 · NIDA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI MITCHELL, SUZANNE H · 2009 to 2009
$190k
NIAAA NIH HHS AA 10760NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA010760NIAAA NIH HHS P60 AA010760NIDA NIH HHS DA015543NIDA NIH HHS DA027580NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015543NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA024195NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA027580NIMH NIH HHS MH059105NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH059105NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH059105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delay discounting is a widely studied phenomenon due to its ubiquity in psychopathological disorders. Several methods are well established to quantify the extent to which a delayed commodity is devalued as a function of the delay to its receipt. The most frequently used method is to fit a hyperbolic function and use an index of the gradient of the function, k, or to calculate the area under the discounting curve. The manuscript examines the behavior of these quantification indices for three different datasets, as well as provides information about potential limitations in their use. The primary limitation examined is the lack of mechanistic specificity provided by either method. Alternative formulations that are thought to provide some mechanistic information are examined for the three separate datasets: two variants of a hyperboloid model (Rachlin, 1989, Judgment, decision and choice. New York: W.H. Freeman) and the quasi-hyperbolic model (Laibson, 1997, Q. J. Econ., 112, 443-477). Examination of the parameters of each formulation suggests that the parameters derived from the quasi-hyperbolic model allows groups and conditions within the three datasets to be reliably distinguished more readily than the hyperboloid models. However, use of the quasi-hyperbolic model is complex and its limitations might offset its ability to discriminate within the datasets. "This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: SQAB 2014".

Indexed as

Delay DiscountingJudgmentModels, PsychologicalAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityChoice BehaviorHumansSmokingAttention deficit hyperactivity disorderCigarette smokingDelay discountingImpulsive behaviorReward

Identifiers

PMID25796454
PMCPMC4404224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.