Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25796375›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2015

The role of hyperthermic intraperitoneal intraoperative chemotherapy in ovarian cancer.

W J van Driel, C A R Lok, V Verwaal, G S Sonke

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

W J van DrielDepartment of Gyne-oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, w.v.driel@nki.nl.
C A R Lok
V Verwaal
G S Sonke
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the fourth most common gynecologic cancer in Europe and is the leading cause of death among women with gynecologic malignancies. This is due to the fact that the majority of the patients are diagnosed with advanced stage disease. In these stages, extensive intraperitoneal metastases are often present, making therapy more difficult. The current standard treatment involves primary or interval cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy. However, many patients develop intraperitoneal (IP) recurrences despite complete surgery and chemotherapy. Therefore, alternative ways to deliver chemotherapy have been examined. Administration of the chemotherapy directly into the peritoneal cavity allows high doses of the cytotoxic agent at the site of the cancer, while minimizing the occurrence of systemic side effects. Theoretically, IP administration is most beneficial when only microscopic disease is present since penetration of the drug is limited to a few millimeters. IP chemotherapy can be administered during surgery under hyperthermic conditions (HIPEC) or during regular chemotherapy courses through a catheter placed into the abdominal cavity. IP administration results in an improved survival, although catheter-related morbidity is reported. Hyperthermia potentiates the cytotoxic effect of chemotherapy and may therefore have an additional positive effect on prognosis. Although recent observational studies show encouraging results with respect to effect on survival and rate of complications, it remains a challenge to identify those patients who would benefit most from adding HIPEC to the standard treatment. In this respect, age and timing of HIPEC during treatment might be important factors, although no convincing evidence is available yet. Currently, a total of 18 clinical trials are open and to answer the above-mentioned questions, it is adamant to complete these trials, especially the randomized phase III trials. Accrual is hampered by the fact that HIPEC is currently offered as standard treatment in some centers even though convincing evidence is not yet available. If these phase III trials show positive results in favor of HIPEC, subsequent trials comparing surgery and postoperative IP chemotherapy with surgery and HIPEC seem a logical next step.

Indexed as

Hyperthermia, InducedAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCisplatinFemaleHumansInfusions, ParenteralIntraoperative PeriodOvarian NeoplasmsPaclitaxelAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCisplatinPaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID25796375
OpenAlexW2065224650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.