Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25795777›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2015

DNA topoisomerase I domain interactions impact enzyme activity and sensitivity to camptothecin.

Christine M Wright, Marié van der Merwe, Amanda H DeBrot, Mary-Ann Bjornsti

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genes · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Topoisomerase IB: a relaxing enzyme for stressed DNA.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christine M WrightFrom the Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294 and.
Marié van der MerweDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105.
Amanda H DeBrotFrom the Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294 and.
Mary-Ann BjornstiFrom the Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294 and bjornsti@uab.edu.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · US

Funding

XRAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA013148 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Robert S Welner · 1985 to 2026
$165.9M
DNA TOPOISOMERASE-CAMPTOTHECIN INTERACTIONSR01CA058755 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BJORNSTI, MARY-ANN · 1993 to 2011
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA58755NCI NIH HHS P30 CA013148NCI NIH HHS P30CA013148NCI NIH HHS R01 CA058755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During processes such as DNA replication and transcription, DNA topoisomerase I (Top1) catalyzes the relaxation of DNA supercoils. The nuclear enzyme is also the cellular target of camptothecin (CPT) chemotherapeutics. Top1 contains four domains: the highly conserved core and C-terminal domains involved in catalysis, a coiled-coil linker domain of variable length, and a poorly conserved N-terminal domain. Yeast and human Top1 share a common reaction mechanism and domain structure. However, the human Top1 is ∼100-fold more sensitive to CPT. Moreover, substitutions of a conserved Gly(717) residue, which alter intrinsic enzyme sensitivity to CPT, induce distinct phenotypes in yeast. To address the structural basis for these differences, reciprocal swaps of yeast and human Top1 domains were engineered in chimeric enzymes. Here we report that intrinsic Top1 sensitivity to CPT is dictated by the composition of the conserved core and C-terminal domains. However, independent of CPT, biochemically similar chimeric enzymes produced strikingly distinct phenotypes in yeast. Expression of a human Top1 chimera containing the yeast linker domain proved toxic, even in the context of a catalytically inactive Y723F enzyme. Lethality was suppressed either by splicing the yeast N-terminal domain into the chimera, deleting the human N-terminal residues, or in enzymes reconstituted by polypeptide complementation. These data demonstrate a functional interaction between the N-terminal and linker domains, which, when mispaired between yeast and human enzymes, induces cell lethality. Because toxicity was independent of enzyme catalysis, the inappropriate coordination of N-terminal and linker domains may induce aberrant Top1-protein interactions to impair cell growth.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceCamptothecinCatalysisDNA Topoisomerases, Type IHumansModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataProtein Structure, TertiaryRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSequence Homology, Amino AcidSpecies SpecificityTopoisomerase I InhibitorsCamptothecinDNA Topoisomerases, Type IRecombinant Fusion ProteinsTOP1 protein, humanTopoisomerase I InhibitorsAnticancer DrugCamptothecinDNA TopoisomeraseProtein ChimeraProtein DomainSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID25795777
PMCPMC4424343
OpenAlexW1978616653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.