Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25795693›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2015

Mammograms on-the-go-predictors of repeat visits to mobile mammography vans in St Louis, Missouri, USA: a case-control study.

Bettina F Drake, Salmafatima S Abadin, Sarah Lyons, Su-Hsin Chang, Lauren T Steward, Susan Kraenzle, Melody S Goodman

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06305312 (Community Services Navigation to Advance Health Equity in Breast Cancer Screening), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06305312 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Community Services Navigation to Advance Health Equity in Breast Cancer Screening

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2024 to 2028Enrolled1,450ConditionsBreast CancerArmsCommunity Service Navigation, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Mobile Cancer Screening Programs: A Systematic Review of Implementation Challenges and Population Access.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Mobile Mammography Services and Underserved Women.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  4. Needs for Cancer Education In Oman Based on the Breast Cancer Screening Program.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Article
  5. Beyond broadband: digital inclusion as a driver of inequities in access to rural cancer care.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2020
    Article
  6. Mobile health clinics in the United States.International journal for equity in health · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bettina F DrakeDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Salmafatima S AbadinDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Sarah LyonsDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Su-Hsin ChangDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Lauren T StewardDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Susan KraenzleJoanne Knight Breast Health Center, St Louis, Missouri, USA The Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St Louis, Missouri, USA Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Melody S GoodmanDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8932-624X

Funding

Worksite Policies and neighborhood Influences on Obesity and Cancer RiskU54CA155496 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI COLDITZ, GRAHAM A. · 2011 to 2016
$9.0M
Training ProgramU54CA153460 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI COLDITZ, GRAHAM A. · 2010 to 2015
$5.3M
Prostate Cancer Survivor Outreach and Education Message Testing StudyU01CA114594 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI COLDITZ, GRAHAM A. · 2005 to 2009
$2.2M
OBESITY, COMORBIDITIES, AND ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS OF SURGICAL TREATMENTS OF OBESITK01HS022330 · AHRQ · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CHANG, SU-HSIN · 2013 to 2016
$505k
AHRQ HHS K01 HS022330NCI NIH HHS U01 CA114594NCI NIH HHS U01 CA114594-01NCI NIH HHS U54 CA153460NCI NIH HHS U54CA153460-01NCI NIH HHS U54 CA155496
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAmong women, breast cancer is the most common non-cutaneous cancer and second most common cause of cancer-related death. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which women use mobile mammography vans for breast cancer screening and what factors are associated with repeat visits to these vans.

designA case-control study. Cases are women who had a repeat visit to the mammography van. (n=2134).

participantsWomen who received a mammogram as part of Siteman Cancer Center's Breast Health Outreach Program responded to surveys and provided access to their clinical records (N=8450). Only visits from 2006 to 2014 to the mammography van were included. OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome is having a repeat visit to the mammography van. Among the participants, 25.3% (N=2134) had multiple visits to the mobile mammography van. Data were analysed using χ(2) tests, logistic regression and negative binomial regression.

resultsWomen who were aged 50-65, uninsured, or African-American had higher odds of a repeat visit to the mobile mammography van compared with women who were aged 40-50, insured, or Caucasian (OR=1.135, 95% CI 1.013 to 1.271; OR=1.302, 95% CI 1.146 to 1.479; OR=1.281, 95% CI 1.125 to 1.457), respectively. However, the odds of having a repeat visit to the van were lower among women who reported a rural ZIP code or were unemployed compared with women who provided a suburban ZIP code or were employed (OR=0.503, 95% CI 0.411 to 0.616; OR=.868, 95% CI 0.774 to 0.972), respectively.

conclusionThis study has identified key characteristics of women who are either more or less likely to use mobile mammography vans as their primary source of medical care for breast cancer screening and have repeat visits.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsBlack or African AmericanBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansMammographyMedically UninsuredMiddle AgedMissouriMobile Health UnitsPatient Acceptance of Health CareRural PopulationPREVENTIVE MEDICINEPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID25795693
PMCPMC4368932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.