Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25795675›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2015

Hierarchy of Carbon Source Utilization in Soil Bacteria: Hegemonic Preference for Benzoate in Complex Aromatic Compound Mixtures Degraded by Cupriavidus pinatubonensis Strain JMP134.

Danilo Pérez-Pantoja, Pablo Leiva-Novoa, Raúl A Donoso, Cedric Little, Margarita Godoy, Dietmar H Pieper, Bernardo González

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genome-resolved analysis of Serratia marcescens strain SMTT infers niche specialization as a hydrocarbon-degrader.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Danilo Pérez-PantojaMillennium Nucleus on Plant Functional Genomics, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Pablo Leiva-NovoaFacultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Center of Applied Ecology and Sustainability, Santiago, Chile Millennium Nucleus on Plant Functional Genomics, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Raúl A DonosoFacultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Center of Applied Ecology and Sustainability, Santiago, Chile Millennium Nucleus on Plant Functional Genomics, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Cedric LittleFacultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Center of Applied Ecology and Sustainability, Santiago, Chile.
Margarita GodoyMillennium Nucleus on Plant Functional Genomics, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Dietmar H PieperMicrobial Interactions Processes Research Group, Department of Medical Microbiology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
Bernardo GonzálezFacultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Center of Applied Ecology and Sustainability, Santiago, Chile Millennium Nucleus on Plant Functional Genomics, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile bernardo.gonzalez@uai.cl.
Adolfo Ibáñez University · CLPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLHelmholtz Centre for Infection Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cupriavidus pinatubonensis JMP134, like many other environmental bacteria, uses a range of aromatic compounds as carbon sources. Previous reports have shown a preference for benzoate when this bacterium grows on binary mixtures composed of this aromatic compound and 4-hydroxybenzoate or phenol. However, this observation has not been extended to other aromatic mixtures resembling a more archetypal context. We carried out a systematic study on the substrate preference of C. pinatubonensis JMP134 growing on representative aromatic compounds channeled through different catabolic pathways described in aerobic bacteria. Growth tests of nearly the entire set of binary combinations and in mixtures composed of 5 or 6 aromatic components showed that benzoate and phenol were always the preferred and deferred growth substrates, respectively. This pattern was supported by kinetic analyses that showed shorter times to initiate consumption of benzoate in aromatic compound mixtures. Gene expression analysis by real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) showed that, in all mixtures, the repression by benzoate over other catabolic pathways was exerted mainly at the transcriptional level. Additionally, inhibition of benzoate catabolism suggests that its multiple repressive actions are not mediated by a sole mechanism, as suggested by dissimilar requirements of benzoate degradation for effective repression in different aromatic compound mixtures. The hegemonic preference for benzoate over multiple aromatic carbon sources is not explained on the basis of growth rate and/or biomass yield on each single substrate or by obvious chemical or metabolic properties of these aromatic compounds.

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyBacterial ProteinsBenzoatesBiodegradation, EnvironmentalCarbonCulture MediaCupriavidusGene Expression Regulation, BacterialHydrocarbons, AromaticMutationParabensPhenolReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionTranscription, Genetic4-hydroxybenzoic acidBacterial ProteinsBenzoatesCarbonCulture MediaHydrocarbons, AromaticParabensPhenol

Identifiers

PMID25795675
PMCPMC4524160
OpenAlexW2048742930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.