Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25795673›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2015

Genetic Diversity and Pathogenic Potential of Attaching and Effacing Escherichia coli O26:H11 Strains Recovered from Bovine Feces in the United States.

Sarah A Ison, Sabine Delannoy, Marie Bugarel, Kendra K Nightingale, Hattie E Webb, David G Renter, Tiruvoor G Nagaraja, Guy H Loneragan, Patrick Fach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Evaluation of Cattle for Naturally Colonized Shiga Toxin-ProducingInternational journal of microbiology · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Mobilome; A Major Contributor toFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sarah A IsonTexas Tech University, Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Sabine DelannoyFrench Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety, Food Safety Laboratory, Platform IdentyPath, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Marie BugarelTexas Tech University, Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Kendra K NightingaleTexas Tech University, Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Hattie E WebbTexas Tech University, Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
David G RenterKansas State University, Department of Diagnostic Medicine Pathobiology, Manhattan, Kansas, USA.
Tiruvoor G NagarajaKansas State University, Department of Diagnostic Medicine Pathobiology, Manhattan, Kansas, USA.
Guy H LoneraganTexas Tech University, Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Patrick FachFrench Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety, Food Safety Laboratory, Platform IdentyPath, Maisons-Alfort, France patrick.fach@anses.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Escherichia coli O26 has been identified as the most common non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) serogroup to cause human illnesses in the United States and has been implicated in outbreaks around the world. E. coli has high genomic plasticity, which facilitates the loss or acquisition of virulence genes. Attaching and effacing E. coli (AEEC) O26 strains have frequently been isolated from bovine feces, and there is a need to better characterize the relatedness of these strains to defined molecular pathotypes and to describe the extent of their genetic diversity. High-throughput real-time PCR was used to screen 178 E. coli O26 isolates from a single U.S. cattle feedlot, collected from May to July 2011, for the presence or absence of 25 O26 serogroup-specific and virulence-associated markers. The selected markers were capable of distinguishing these strains into molecularly defined groups (yielding 18 unique marker combinations). Analysis of the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat 1 (CRISPR1) and CRISPR2a loci further discriminated isolates into 24 CRISPR types. The combination of molecular markers and CRISPR typing provided 20.8% diversity. The recent CRISPR PCR target SP_O26-E, which was previously identified only in stx2-positive O26:H11 human clinical strains, was identified in 96.4% (161/167 [95% confidence interval, 99.2 to 93.6%]) of the stx-negative AEEC O26:H11 bovine fecal strains. This supports that these stx-negative strains may have previously contained a prophage carrying stx or could acquire this prophage, thus possibly giving them the potential to become pathogenic to humans. These results show that investigation of specific genetic markers may further elucidate our understanding of the genetic diversity of AEEC O26 strains in bovine feces.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesEscherichia coli InfectionsFecesGenotypeHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysMolecular TypingReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSerogroupShiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coliUnited StatesVirulence FactorsVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID25795673
PMCPMC4421050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.