Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25795463›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular pathology : the official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology

The winding road to regenerating the human heart.

Kaytlyn A Gerbin, Charles E Murry

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular pathology : the official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
17.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Longevity.Clinical medicine & research · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Injectable biodegradable microcarriers for iPSC expansion and cardiomyocyte differentiation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Progress in Bioengineering Strategies for Heart Regenerative Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Cardiac regeneration: Options for repairing the injured heart.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Cardiac Cell Therapy: Insights into the Mechanisms of Tissue Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Future of Direct Cardiac Reprogramming: AnyInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Self-healing injectable gelatin hydrogels for localized therapeutic cell delivery.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kaytlyn A GerbinDepartment of Bioengineering, Center for Cardiovascular Biology and the Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Charles E MurryDepartment of Bioengineering, Center for Cardiovascular Biology and the Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Pathology, Center for Cardiovascular Biology and the Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Medicine/Cardiology, Center for Cardiovascular Biology and the Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: murry@uw.edu.
University of Washington · US

Funding

Vector and Transgenic Mouse CoreP30DK017047 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Karin E Bornfeldt · 1986 to 2026
$41.4M
Self Renewal and Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem CellsP01GM081619 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WARE, CAROL B · 2007 to 2017
$20.6M
Vascularization and Growth of Human Myocardial GraftsP01HL094374 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MURRY, CHARLES E · 2010 to 2014
$14.5M
Expansion of cardiac and hematopoietic progenitors by Wnt and NotchU01HL100405 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI EPSTEIN, JONATHAN A., MORRISEY, EDWARD E · 2009 to 2015
$8.1M
Cell-Based Cardiac RepairR01HL084642 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MURRY, CHARLES E · 2007 to 2014
$4.9M
Bioengineering Cardiovascular Training GrantT32EB001650 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI REGNIER, MICHAEL · 2004 to 2019
$3.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL094374NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL084642NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL100405NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB001650NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK017047NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM081619NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM81619
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledRegenerating the human heart is a challenge that has engaged researchers and clinicians around the globe for nearly a century. From the repair of the first septal defect in 1953, followed by the first successful heart transplant in 1967, and later to the first infusion of bone marrow-derived cells to the human myocardium in 2002, significant progress has been made in heart repair. However, chronic heart failure remains a leading pathological burden worldwide. Why has regenerating the human heart been such a challenge, and how close are we to achieving clinically relevant regeneration? Exciting progress has been made to establish cell transplantation techniques in recent years, and new preclinical studies in large animal models have shed light on the promises and challenges that lie ahead. In this review, we will discuss the history of cell therapy approaches and provide an overview of clinical trials using cell transplantation for heart regeneration. Focusing on the delivery of human stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes, current experimental strategies in the field will be discussed as well as their clinical translation potential. Although the human heart has not been regenerated yet, decades of experimental progress have guided us onto a promising path. SUMMARY: Previous work in clinical cell therapy for heart repair using bone marrow mononuclear cells, mesenchymal stem cells, and cardiac-derived cells have overall demonstrated safety and modest efficacy. Recent advancements using human stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes have established them as a next generation cell type for moving forward, however certain challenges must be overcome for this technique to be successful in the clinics.

Indexed as

HeartHumansRegenerationCell transplantationHeart regenerationMyocardial infarctionStem cell-derived cardiomyocytes

Identifiers

PMID25795463
PMCPMC4430350
OpenAlexW2026089421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.