ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2015
miRBoost: boosting support vector machines for microRNA precursor classification.
Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The associations between Toll-like receptor 4 gene polymorphisms and hepatitis C virus infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Bioscience reports · 2019Pooled it
- Identification and bioinformatic functional analysis of novel and known polymorphisms in the myostatin gene of Ukrainian Carpathian Mountain sheep.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of sequential and thermodynamic features of pre-miRNA in insects with various organisms and applying XGBoost for one-vs-rest binary classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparison and benchmark of deep learning methods for non-coding RNA classification.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Integrative genomic phylogeography reveals signs of mitonuclear incompatibility in a natural hybrid goby population.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2021Article
- A Brief Survey for MicroRNA Precursor Identification Using Machine Learning Methods.Current genomics · 2020Review
- miRWoods: Enhanced precursor detection and stacked random forests for the sensitive detection of microRNAs.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Sparse support vector machines with LArtificial intelligence in medicine · 2019Article
- Article
- CL-PMI: A Precursor MicroRNA Identification Method Based on Convolutional and Long Short-Term Memory Networks.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Novel and Haplotype Specific MicroRNAs Encoded by the Major Histocompatibility Complex.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Article
- miRNAFold: a web server for fast miRNA precursor prediction in genomes.Nucleic acids research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identification of microRNAs (miRNAs) is an important step toward understanding post-transcriptional gene regulation and miRNA-related pathology. Difficulties in identifying miRNAs through experimental techniques combined with the huge amount of data from new sequencing technologies have made in silico discrimination of bona fide miRNA precursors from non-miRNA hairpin-like structures an important topic in bioinformatics. Among various techniques developed for this classification problem, machine learning approaches have proved to be the most promising. However these approaches require the use of training data, which is problematic due to an imbalance in the number of miRNAs (positive data) and non-miRNAs (negative data), which leads to a degradation of their performance. In order to address this issue, we present an ensemble method that uses a boosting technique with support vector machine components to deal with imbalanced training data. Classification is performed following a feature selection on 187 novel and existing features. The algorithm, miRBoost, performed better in comparison with state-of-the-art methods on imbalanced human and cross-species data. It also showed the highest ability among the tested methods for discovering novel miRNA precursors. In addition, miRBoost was over 1400 times faster than the second most accurate tool tested and was significantly faster than most of the other tools. miRBoost thus provides a good compromise between prediction efficiency and execution time, making it highly suitable for use in genome-wide miRNA precursor prediction. The software miRBoost is available on our web server http://EvryRNA.ibisc.univ-evry.fr.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.