Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25795393›Full record

ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis2015

Diagnostic and prognostic significance of flow cytometry immunophenotyping in patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis.

D Subirá, M Simó, J Illán, C Serrano, S Castañón, R Gonzalo, J J Granizo, M Martínez-García, M Navarro, J Pardo and 1 more

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Leptomeningeal Disease: Current Approaches and Future Directions.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. The path to leptomeningeal metastasis.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Advances in Intraoperative Flow Cytometry.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Leptomeningeal Metastases.Current treatment options in oncology · 2018
    Review
  17. Neoplastic meningitis in solid tumors: from diagnosis to personalized treatments.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

D SubiráDepartment of Hematology, Flow Cytometry Division, Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara, c/Donantes de sangre s.n., 19002, Guadalajara, Spain, dosuperez@yahoo.es.
M Simó
J Illán
C Serrano
S Castañón
R Gonzalo
J J Granizo
M Martínez-García
M Navarro
J Pardo
J Bruna
Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ESDuran i Reynals Hospital · ESHospital Del Mar · ESHospital Universitario de Guadalajara · ESHospital Universitario Infanta Cristina · ESHospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos · ESInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some patients with epithelial-cell cancers develop leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC), a severe complication difficult to diagnose and with an adverse prognosis. This study explores the contribution of flow cytometry immunophenotyping (FCI) to the diagnosis and prognosis of LC. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from patients diagnosed with LC were studied using FCI. Expression of the epithelial-cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) was the criterion used to identify the epithelial cells. To test the diagnostic precision, 144 patients (94 diagnosed with LC) were included. The prognostic value of FCI was evaluated in 72 patients diagnosed with LC and eligible for therapy. Compared with cytology, FCI showed greater sensitivity and negative predictive value (79.79 vs. 50%; 68.85 vs. 51.55%, respectively), but lower specificity and positive predictive value (84 vs. 100%; 90.36 vs. 100%, respectively). The multivariate analysis revealed that the percentage of CSF EpCAM+ cells predicted an increased risk of death (HR: 1.012, 95% CI 1.000-1.023; p=0.041). A cut-off value of 8% EpCAM+ cells in the CSF distinguished two groups of patients with statistically significant differences in overall survival (OS) (p=0.018). This cut-off value kept its statistical significance regardless of the absolute CSF cell-count. The FCI study of the CSF improved the sensitivity for diagnosing LC, but refinement of the technique is needed to improve specificity. Furthermore, quantification of CSF EpCAM+ cells was revealed to be an independent prognostic factor for OS in patients with LC eligible for therapy. An 8% cut-off value contributed to predicting clinical evolution before initiation of therapy.

Indexed as

AgedAntigens, NeoplasmCell Adhesion MoleculesCell CountCerebrospinal FluidEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeEpithelial CellsFemaleFlow CytometryHumansImmunophenotypingMaleMeningeal CarcinomatosisMiddle AgedPrognosisAntigens, NeoplasmCell Adhesion MoleculesEPCAM protein, humanEpithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule

Identifiers

PMID25795393
OpenAlexW1965139538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.