Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25795212›Full record

ArticleJournal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine2015

Comparison of risk-based hepatitis C screening and the true seroprevalence in an urban prison system.

Danica E Kuncio, E Claire Newbern, Marcelo H Fernandez-Viña, Bruce Herdman, Caroline C Johnson, Kendra M Viner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Opioid epidemic and liver disease.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2019
    Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Hepatitis C Guidance 2018 Update: AASLD-IDSA Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis C Virus Infection.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Danica E KuncioPhiladelphia Department of Public Health, Division of Disease Control, 500 S. Broad St., Philadelphia, PA, 19146, USA, Danica.kuncio@phila.gov.
E Claire Newbern
Marcelo H Fernandez-Viña
Bruce Herdman
Caroline C Johnson
Kendra M Viner

Funding

ADDRESSING SYNDEMICS THROUGH PROGRAM COLLABORATION and SERVICE INTERGRATIONU38PS003152 · PS · PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENTOF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI JOHNSON, CAROLINE CARLSON · 2010 to 2013
$1.3M
NCHHSTP CDC HHS 5U38PS003152NCHHSTP CDC HHS U38 PS003152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the most common blood-borne infection in the USA, though seroprevalence is elevated in certain high-risk groups such as inmates. Correctional facility screening protocols vary from universal testing to opt-in risk-based testing. This project assessed the success of a risk-based HCV screening strategy in the Philadelphia Prison System (PPS) by comparing results from current testing practices during 2011-2012 (Risk-Based Screening Group) to a September 2012 blinded seroprevalence study (Philadelphia Department of Public Health (PDPH) Study Cohort). PPS processed 51,562 inmates in 2011-2012; 2,727 were identified as high-risk and screened for HCV, of whom 57 % tested HCV antibody positive. Twelve percent (n = 154) of the 1,289 inmates in the PDPH Study Cohort were anti-HCV positive. Inmates ≥30 years of age had higher rates of seropositivity in both groups. Since only 5.3 % of the prison population was included in the Risk-Based Screening Group, an additional 4,877 HCV-positive inmates are projected to have not been identified in 2011-2012. Gaps in case identification exist when risk-based testing is utilized by PPS. A more comprehensive screening model such as opt-out universal testing should be considered to identify HCV-positive inmates. Identification of these individuals is an important opportunity to aid underserved high-risk populations and to provide medical care and secondary prevention.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsFemaleHepatitis CHepatitis C AntibodiesHumansMaleMass ScreeningPhiladelphiaPrisonsRisk FactorsSeroepidemiologic StudiesSex FactorsUrban HealthHepatitis C Antibodies

Identifiers

PMID25795212
PMCPMC4411325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.