ArticleSurgery today2016
Significance of the mucinous component in the histopathological classification of colon cancer.
Article in Surgery today, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Collagen disorder architecture features are associated with clinical, molecular, genetic factors and survival outcomes in colon cancer.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Clinical significance of mucinous component in colorectal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched study.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- Clinical significance of a microRNA signature for the identification and predicting prognosis in colorectal cancers with mucinous differentiation.Carcinogenesis · 2020Article
- Factors associated with short recurrence-free survival in completely resected colon cancer.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMucinous carcinoma is often independently classified as a histological type of colon cancer, but there are currently no established diagnostic criteria. The relationship between the proportions of mucinous components to the oncological outcomes was examined to determine whether mucinous carcinoma should be classified as an independent histological type.
methodsThe study group comprised 1,038 patients with colon cancer. The relationships between the survival rates and recurrence patterns with the mucinous component area ratio (MC area ratio) and clinical variables were evaluated.
resultsTumors were classified into three groups: Group 1 (MC area ratio, 0 %), Group 2 (1-49 %), and Group 3 (≥50 %). Of the 1038 tumors studied, 877 (84 %) were classified as Group 1, 123 (12 %) as Group 2, and 38 (4 %) as Group 3. The tumor size was significantly larger in Group 3, and an increased MC area ratio was significantly related to a higher proportion of right-sided tumors. Among patients with stage II or III disease, stage III disease, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, and no adjuvant chemotherapy were poor prognostic factors. There was no relationship between the MC area ratio and the survival or recurrence pattern.
conclusionMucinous carcinoma does not need to be classified as a separate histological type from ordinary differentiated adenocarcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.