Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25794698›Full record

Trial reportEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2015

Lumbar total disc replacement by less invasive lateral approach: a report of results from two centers in the US IDE clinical trial of the XL TDR® device.

Antoine G Tohmeh, William D Smith

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Lumbar total disc arthroplasty: outdated surgery or here to stay procedure? A systematic review of current literature.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.International journal of spine surgery · 2018
    Article
  6. In vitro analysis of circumferential joint replacement, including bilateral facet joint replacement with lateral lumber disc prosthesis: a parametric investigation of disc sizing.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Antoine G TohmehNorthwest Orthopaedic Specialists, 212 East Central, Suite 140, Spokane, WA, 99208, USA, tohmeh@comcast.net.
William D Smith

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes following total disc arthroplasty using the XL TDR(®) Lumbar Disc in the treatment of patients with symptomatic degenerative disc disease at one level between L1-2 and L4-5.

methodsData were compiled from two centers participating in a prospective, multi-center Food and Drug Administration-approved investigational device exemption clinical trial enrolling patients with single-level lumbar degenerative disc disease unresponsive to non-operative treatment. Longitudinal outcomes were evaluated through 3-year follow-up and included patient-reported pain, function, and general health, as well as radiographic measures such as maintenance of disc height and range of motion.

resultsThe two-center cohort included 64 treated patients, 42 % female, averaging 45.3 years of age (range 26-67). The majority of procedures were performed at the L4-5 level (75 %), uncomplicated, with minimal blood loss (88 % 0-50 cc), and in an outpatient setting (93.8 %). Postoperative events included 10 patients (15.6 %) with new hip flexion weakness, 7 (10.9 %) with new lower extremity weakness, and 10 (15.6 %) with new lower extremity sensory deficits, all resolved by 3 months in all but two patients whose deficits were prolonged but eventually resolved. Average disc height increased postoperatively from 7.2 to 12.1 mm (69 %), and was 10.7 mm (49 % increase from preoperative) at 3 years. Flexion/extension range of motion averaged 5.9° (SD 4.8°) at 3 years, and was not statistically different from preoperative (p = 0.471). Heterotopic ossification interfering with segmental motion was noted in 3 patients (10.3 %) at 3 years, none ankylosed (Grade IV). Postoperative improvement in patient-reported outcomes was significant (p < 0.01 for all measures) and maintained through 3-year follow-up. Satisfaction with results was reported by 85 % (51/60) of patients at 2 years and 93 % (28/30) at 3 years. There were no revisions through 3 years postoperative.

conclusionsThe results following XL TDR show good clinical and radiographic outcomes out to 3 years postoperative, with clinically significant improvements in pain, function, and general health, few complications, and high patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntervertebral Disc DegenerationLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedOssification, HeterotopicPatient SatisfactionPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRange of Motion, ArticularTotal Disc ReplacementUnited States

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.