ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2015
Improvement in prehospital time in acute coronary syndrome between 1985 and 2013 in the south-eastern area of Hungary.
Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of acute coronary syndrome in emergency departments: a cross sectional multicenter study (Tunisia).BMC emergency medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a life-threatening condition and the time-period from the onset of symptoms to the patients' arrival into the hospital has crucial importance. The authors investigated retrospectively the patients' decision time (time from the onset of the symptoms to seeking medical help) and the transport time to hospital arrival. In Hungary, it is unique of its kind that the present data can be compared to those obtained in the same area almost three decades ago.One-hundred forty-two patients (106 males and 36 females) were involved in the study, the mean age ± SD was 62.4 ± 11.3 years. The median decision time was 40 min; the median hospital arrival time was 2 h and 13 min. These were significantly shorter than in 1985-1986. These time parameters were influenced neither by gender, age, the number of inhabitants in the patients' city, the patients' education level, the occurrence of any former coronary event in the family and nor by the fact that the type of ACS was myocardial infarction with or without ST segment elevation.During the last two and half decades both the decision and the hospital arrival time decreased significantly (by 39 and 28 %, respectively) probably due to greater knowledge of general practitioners and the better organized ambulance service. Further improvement is needed; this can be expected by consistent education of the patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.