ArticleCurrent microbiology2015
A comparative study of McFarland turbidity standards and the Densimat photometer to determine bacterial cell density.
Article in Current microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of Antioxidant Capacity, Phytochemical Phenolic Composition, Cholinesterase and α-Glucosidase Inhibitory Activities, and Antimicrobial Potential ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of outer membrane protein and whole cell antigen vaccine against avian pathogenIranian journal of microbiology · 2026Article
- Magnetotactic bacteria as biostimulants for enhancing the growth and yield of tomato and paddy under abiotic stress.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Exploring the anti-microbial potential of benzylated imidazolium salts: synthesis, docking studies, and biological evaluation.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Comparative Performance Evaluation of Continuous Monitoring Blood Culture Systems Using Simulated Septic Specimen.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Identification and Antimicrobial Potential of Marine Sponges (International journal of microbiology · 2025Article
- Bioactivation of Konjac Glucomannan Films by Tannic Acid and Gluconolactone Addition.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024Article
- Revealing microbial diversity in buffalo milk with high somatic cell counts: implications for mastitis diagnosis and treatment.Veterinary research communications · 2024Article
- Green-Synthesized Characterization, Antioxidant and Antibacterial Applications of CtAC/MNPs-Ag Nanocomposites.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Assessing Diesel Tolerance ofACS omega · 2024Article
- Prevalence ofFrontiers in public health · 2024Article
- A study to assess the pharmacological agent potential of gold nanoparticles and their effects on human cancer cells and hospital pathogens usingFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- To Evaluate and Compare the Antimicrobial Efficacy of Various Disinfecting Agents on K-file against Gram-positive and Gram-negative Bacteria of Endodontic Origin: AnInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2023Article
- Piezodynamic Eradication of Both Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria by Using a Nanoparticle Embedded Polymeric Membrane.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- The characterization of collagen-based scaffolds modified with phenolic acids for tissue engineering application.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Chitosan-Based Membranes as Gentamicin Carriers for Biomedical Applications-Influence of Chitosan Molecular Weight.Membranes · 2023Article
- Electrospun Membrane Based on Poly(L-co-D,L lactic acid) and Natural Rubber Containing Copaiba Oil Designed as a Dressing with Antimicrobial Properties.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Evaluation of DNA Extraction Methods for Reliable Quantification ofBiosensors · 2023Article
- [Impact of preservatives in topicals on the cutaneous microbiota].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
McFarland Turbidity Standards and the Densimat photometer were compared for their accuracy to adjust bacterial suspensions. Six bacterial species were tested with both methods. Statistical analyses showed that adjusting bacterial suspensions with the Densimat photometer results in less variation within assays and in a more accurate determination of bacterial inocula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25794482What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.