Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25794298›Full record

ReviewStem cells and development2015

Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Models to Enable In Vitro Models for Screening in the Central Nervous System.

Joshua G Hunsberger, Anastasia G Efthymiou, Nasir Malik, Mamta Behl, Ivy L Mead, Xianmin Zeng, Anton Simeonov, Mahendra Rao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cells and development, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Pluripotent stem cells for target organ developmental toxicity testing.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Stem cells international · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joshua G Hunsberger1 Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine , Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Anastasia G Efthymiou2 Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , Bethesda, Maryland.
Nasir Malik3 National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), National Institutes of Health (NIH) , Bethesda, Maryland.
Mamta Behl4 National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences , Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Ivy L Mead1 Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine , Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Xianmin Zeng5 Buck Institute for Age Research , Novato, California.
Anton Simeonov6 National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), National Institutes of Health (NIH) , Rockville, Maryland.
Mahendra Rao7 New York Stem Cell Foundation , New York, New York.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is great need to develop more predictive drug discovery tools to identify new therapies to treat diseases of the central nervous system (CNS). Current nonpluripotent stem cell-based models often utilize non-CNS immortalized cell lines and do not enable the development of personalized models of disease. In this review, we discuss why in vitro models are necessary for translational research and outline the unique advantages of induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-based models over those of current systems. We suggest that iPSC-based models can be patient specific and isogenic lines can be differentiated into many neural cell types for detailed comparisons. iPSC-derived cells can be combined to form small organoids, or large panels of lines can be developed that enable new forms of analysis. iPSC and embryonic stem cell-derived cells can be readily engineered to develop reporters for lineage studies or mechanism of action experiments further extending the utility of iPSC-based systems. We conclude by describing novel technologies that include strategies for the development of diversity panels, novel genomic engineering tools, new three-dimensional organoid systems, and modified high-content screens that may bring toxicology into the 21st century. The strategic integration of these technologies with the advantages of iPSC-derived cell technology, we believe, will be a paradigm shift for toxicology and drug discovery efforts.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Culture TechniquesCentral Nervous System AgentsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsNeuronsCentral Nervous System Agents

Identifiers

PMID25794298
PMCPMC4533087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.