Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25794037›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Microbial communities associated with healthy and White syndrome-affected Echinopora lamellosa in aquaria and experimental treatment with the antibiotic ampicillin.

David Smith, Peter Leary, Jamie Craggs, John Bythell, Michael Sweet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Identification of quorum sensing-regulatedFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David SmithSchool of Biology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, United Kingdom; School of Biological Sciences, Medical Biology Centre, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 7BL, United Kingdom.
Peter LearySchool of Biology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, United Kingdom.
Jamie CraggsHorniman Museum and Gardens Aquarium, Forest Hill, London, SE23 3PQ, United Kingdom.
John BythellSchool of Biology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, United Kingdom.
Michael SweetSchool of Biology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, United Kingdom; Biological Sciences Research Group, University of Derby, Kedleston Road, Derby, DE22 1GB, United Kingdom.
Newcastle University · GBHorniman Museum and Gardens · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prokaryotic and ciliate communities of healthy and aquarium White Syndrome (WS)-affected coral fragments were screened using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). A significant difference (R = 0.907, p < 0.001) in 16S rRNA prokaryotic diversity was found between healthy (H), sloughed tissue (ST), WS-affected (WSU) and antibiotic treated (WST) samples. Although 3 Vibrio spp were found in WS-affected samples, two of these species were eliminated following ampicillin treatment, yet lesions continued to advance, suggesting they play a minor or secondary role in the pathogenesis. The third Vibrio sp increased slightly in relative abundance in diseased samples and was abundant in non-diseased samples. Interestingly, a Tenacibaculum sp showed the greatest increase in relative abundance between healthy and WS-affected samples, demonstrating consistently high abundance across all WS-affected and treated samples, suggesting Tenacibaculum sp could be a more likely candidate for pathogenesis in this instance. In contrast to previous studies bacterial abundance did not vary significantly (ANOVA, F2, 6 = 1.000, p = 0.422) between H, ST, WSU or WST. Antimicrobial activity (assessed on Vibrio harveyi cultures) was limited in both H and WSU samples (8.1% ±8.2 and 8.0% ±2.5, respectively) and did not differ significantly (Kruskal-Wallis, χ2 (2) = 3.842, p = 0.146). A Philaster sp, a Cohnilembus sp and a Pseudokeronopsis sp. were present in all WS-affected samples, but not in healthy samples. The exact role of ciliates in WS is yet to be determined, but it is proposed that they are at least responsible for the neat lesion boundary observed in the disease.

Indexed as

AmpicillinAnimalsAnthozoaAnti-Bacterial AgentsArchaeaBacteriaCiliophoraGenetic VariationMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID25794037
PMCPMC4368680
OpenAlexW1986088205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.