Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25793999›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Referred pain patterns provoked on intra-pelvic structures among women with and without chronic pelvic pain: a descriptive study.

Thomas Torstensson, Stephen Butler, Anne Lindgren, Magnus Peterson, Margaretha Eriksson, Per Kristiansson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Heredity of pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain in Sweden.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2023
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas TorstenssonDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Physiotherapy, Sundsvall Hospital, Sundsvall, Sweden.
Stephen ButlerDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Pain Center, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anne LindgrenDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Physiotherapy, Sundsvall Hospital, Sundsvall, Sweden.
Magnus PetersonDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Pain Center, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Margaretha ErikssonDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Per KristianssonDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SEUppsala University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe referred pain patterns provoked from intra-pelvic structures in women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) persisting after childbirth with the purpose to improve diagnostics and give implications for treatment. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this descriptive and comparative study 36 parous women with CPP were recruited from a physiotherapy department waiting list and by advertisements in newspapers. A control group of 29 parous women without CPP was consecutively assessed for eligibility from a midwifery surgery. Inclusion criterion for CPP was: moderate pain in the sacral region persisting at least six months after childbirth confirmed by pelvic pain provocation tests. Exclusion criteria in groups with and without CPP were: persistent back or pelvic pain with onset prior to pregnancy, previous back surgery and positive neurological signs. Pain was provoked by palpation of 13 predetermined intra-pelvic anatomical landmarks. The referred pain distribution was expressed in pain drawings and described in pain maps and calculated referred pain areas.

resultsPain provoked by palpation of the posterior intra-pelvic landmarks was mostly referred to the sacral region and pain provoked by palpation of the ischial and pubic bones was mostly referred to the groin and pubic regions, with or without pain referred down the ipsilateral leg. The average pain distribution area provoked by palpation of all 13 anatomical landmarks was 30.3 mm² (19.2 to 53.7) in women with CPP as compared to 3.2 mm² (1.0 to 5.1) in women without CPP, p< 0.0001.

conclusionsReferred pain patterns provoked from intra-pelvic landmarks in women with CPP are consistent with sclerotomal sensory innervation. Magnification of referred pain patterns indicates allodynia and central sensitization. The results suggest that pain mapping can be used to evaluate and confirm the pain experience among women with CPP and contribute to diagnosis.

Indexed as

Referred PainAdultChronic PainFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPalpationPelvic PainPhysical ExaminationPhysical Therapy Modalities

Identifiers

PMID25793999
PMCPMC4368679
OpenAlexW2115869168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.