Trial reportPloS one2015
Temporal stability and the effects of training on saccade latency in "express saccade makers".
Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of a New Device for Vision Relaxation in Computer Users.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Express saccades during a countermanding task.Journal of neurophysiology · 2020Article
- Increased preparation time reduces, but does not abolish, action history bias of saccadic eye movements.Journal of neurophysiology · 2019Article
- Voluntary Saccade Training Protocol in Persons With Parkinson's Disease and Healthy Adults.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2019Article
- Effects of saccade training on express saccade proportions, saccade latencies, and peak velocities: an investigation of nasal/temporal differences.Experimental brain research · 2018Article
- Reduced Frequency of Ipsilateral Express Saccades in Cervical Dystonia: Probing the Nigro-Tectal Pathway.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2018Article
- Express saccades in distinct populations: east, west, and in-between.Experimental brain research · 2017Article
- Audiovisual Rehabilitation in Hemianopia: A Model-Based Theoretical Investigation.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2017Article
- Direct gaze facilitates rapid orienting to faces: Evidence from express saccades and saccadic potentials.Biological psychology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The temporal stability of saccade latency, and the effects of training, particularly in "express saccade makers" (ESMs), has received little attention. ESMs are healthy, naïve, adults, who persist in executing very many low latency "express saccades" (ES; saccades with latency of 80 ms to 130 ms), in conditions designed to suppress such responses. We investigated the stability of ES production (%ES) in 59 ESM and 54 non-ESM participants in overlap tasks. Within a single session, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for %ES in two runs of 200 trials was 0.97 (p<0.001); participants in whom >30% of saccades over the two runs were ES, were classified as ESMs. For 60 participants tested over two sessions 12 weeks apart, and 30 participants tested in three sessions over approximately six months, the ICC for %ES was uniformly high (0.95, p<0.001 and 0.97, p<0.001 respectively) and participants behaved consistently with their initial classification. Fourteen participants (7 ESMs) were then exposed to training consisting of either gap or overlap tasks. Training increased %ES in both groups. However, when tested in overlap tasks, it was not sufficient to transform Normal participants into ESMs. We conclude that the pattern of saccade behaviour exhibited by ESMs constitutes a stable and distinct oculomotor phenotype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.