Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25793739›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: a retrospective study.

Xiaojia Hou, Zhendong Jin, Can Xu, Minmin Zhang, Jianwei Zhu, Fei Jiang, Zhaoshen Li

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03525847 (The Added Value of Contrast Enhancement for Guiding EUS-FNA in Solid Pancreatic Masses), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03525847 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

The Added Value of Contrast Enhancement for Guiding EUS-FNA in Solid Pancreatic Masses

TypeinterventionalSponsorProfessor Dr. Seicean AndradaRan2017 to 2020Enrolled150ConditionsEndoscopic UltrasonographyArmsEndosonography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Comparison of standardWorld journal of methodology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Contrast-enhanced guided endoscopic ultrasound procedures.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Advanced EUS Imaging Techniques.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaojia HouDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Zhendong JinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Can XuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Minmin ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Jianwei ZhuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Fei JiangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Zhaoshen LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe negative predictive value of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions remains low, and the biopsy specimens are sometimes inadequate for appropriate pathological diagnosis.

aimsTo evaluate the usefulness of a novel method of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for the differential diagnosis and adequate sampling of solid pancreatic lesions.

methodsPatients with a diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions who underwent fine-needle aspiration guided by contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography or by endoscopic ultrasonography from October 2010 to July 2013 were retrospectively identified and classified into the CH-EUS or EUS group, respectively. Surgical pathology and/or follow-up results were defined as the final diagnosis. Operating characteristics and adequacy of biopsy specimens by fine-needle aspiration were compared between the two groups.

resultsOperating characteristics for contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions were as follows: area under the curve = 0.908, sensitivity = 81.6%, specificity = 100%, positive predictive value = 100%, negative predictive value = 74.1%, and accuracy = 87.9%. The percentage of adequate biopsy specimens in the CH-EUS group (96.6%) was greater than that in the EUS group (86.7%).

conclusionSimultaneous contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography during fine-needle aspiration is useful for improving the diagnostic yield and adequate sampling of solid pancreatic lesions.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisEndoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle AspirationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreasPancreatic NeoplasmsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID25793739
PMCPMC4368099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.