Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25793500›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2015

Zinc finger independent genome-wide binding of Sp2 potentiates recruitment of histone-fold protein Nf-y distinguishing it from Sp1 and Sp3.

Sara Völkel, Bastian Stielow, Florian Finkernagel, Thorsten Stiewe, Andrea Nist, Guntram Suske

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The role(s) of NF-Y in development and differentiation.Cell death and differentiation · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sara VölkelInstitute of Molecular Biology and Tumor Research (IMT), Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Bastian StielowInstitute of Molecular Biology and Tumor Research (IMT), Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Florian FinkernagelInstitute of Molecular Biology and Tumor Research (IMT), Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Thorsten StieweGenomics Core Facility, Zentrum für Tumor- und Immunbiologie (ZTI), Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Andrea NistGenomics Core Facility, Zentrum für Tumor- und Immunbiologie (ZTI), Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Guntram SuskeInstitute of Molecular Biology and Tumor Research (IMT), Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Philipps University of Marburg · DEInstitute of Molecular Biology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcription factors are grouped into families based on sequence similarity within functional domains, particularly DNA-binding domains. The Specificity proteins Sp1, Sp2 and Sp3 are paradigmatic of closely related transcription factors. They share amino-terminal glutamine-rich regions and a conserved carboxy-terminal zinc finger domain that can bind to GC rich motifs in vitro. All three Sp proteins are ubiquitously expressed; yet they carry out unique functions in vivo raising the question of how specificity is achieved. Crucially, it is unknown whether they bind to distinct genomic sites and, if so, how binding site selection is accomplished. In this study, we have examined the genomic binding patterns of Sp1, Sp2 and Sp3 in mouse embryonic fibroblasts by ChIP-seq. Sp1 and Sp3 essentially occupy the same promoters and localize to GC boxes. The genomic binding pattern of Sp2 is different; Sp2 primarily localizes at CCAAT motifs. Consistently, re-expression of Sp2 and Sp3 mutants in corresponding knockout MEFs revealed strikingly different modes of genomic binding site selection. Most significantly, while the zinc fingers dictate genomic binding of Sp3, they are completely dispensable for binding of Sp2. Instead, the glutamine-rich amino-terminal region is sufficient for recruitment of Sp2 to its target promoters in vivo. We have identified the trimeric histone-fold CCAAT box binding transcription factor Nf-y as the major partner for Sp2-chromatin interaction. Nf-y is critical for recruitment of Sp2 to co-occupied regulatory elements. Equally, Sp2 potentiates binding of Nf-y to shared sites indicating the existence of an extensive Sp2-Nf-y interaction network. Our results unveil strikingly different recruitment mechanisms of Sp1/Sp2/Sp3 transcription factor members uncovering an unexpected layer of complexity in their binding to chromatin in vivo.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesCCAAT-Binding FactorDNA-Binding ProteinsGene Expression RegulationGenomeHistonesMiceNucleotide MotifsPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein Interaction MapsRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidSp1 Transcription FactorSp2 Transcription FactorSp3 Transcription FactorZinc FingersCCAAT-Binding FactorDNA-Binding ProteinsHistonesSp1 Transcription FactorSp2 Transcription FactorSp3 protein, mouseSp3 Transcription Factor

Identifiers

PMID25793500
PMCPMC4368557
OpenAlexW1987282763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.