ArticlePloS one2015
Protein dynamics associated with failed and rescued learning in the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic background selection with BasCoD enhances contrastive dimension reduction in single cell genomics.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Review
- The Rayleigh Quotient and Contrastive Principal Component Analysis I.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Identifying Cortical Molecular Biomarkers Potentially Associated with Learning in Mice Using Artificial Intelligence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- The Rac-GEF Tiam1 Promotes Dendrite and Synapse Stabilization of Dentate Granule Cells and Restricts Hippocampal-Dependent Memory Functions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021Article
- Altered Protein Profiles During Epileptogenesis in the Pilocarpine Mouse Model of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- In silico identification of critical proteins associated with learning process and immune system for Down syndrome.PloS one · 2019Article
- Exploring patterns enriched in a dataset with contrastive principal component analysis.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Proteomic analysis of six- and twelve-month hippocampus and cerebellum in a murine Down syndrome model.Neurobiology of aging · 2018Article
- Rodent models in Down syndrome research: impact and future opportunities.Disease models & mechanisms · 2017Review
- A Comprehensive Diverse '-omics' Approach to Better Understanding the Molecular Pathomechanisms of Down Syndrome.Brain sciences · 2017Review
- Self-Organizing Feature Maps Identify Proteins Critical to Learning in a Mouse Model of Down Syndrome.PloS one · 2015Article
- Timing of therapies for Down syndrome: the sooner, the better.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2015Review
- Sex differences in protein expression in the mouse brain and their perturbations in a model of Down syndrome.Biology of sex differences · 2015Article
- Bioinformatics Investigation and Contribution of Other Chromosomes Besides Chromosome 21 in the Risk of Down Syndrome Development.Basic and clinical neuroscienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Down syndrome (DS) is caused by an extra copy of human chromosome 21 (Hsa21). Although it is the most common genetic cause of intellectual disability (ID), there are, as yet, no effective pharmacotherapies. The Ts65Dn mouse model of DS is trisomic for orthologs of ∼55% of Hsa21 classical protein coding genes. These mice display many features relevant to those seen in DS, including deficits in learning and memory (L/M) tasks requiring a functional hippocampus. Recently, the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, memantine, was shown to rescue performance of the Ts65Dn in several L/M tasks. These studies, however, have not been accompanied by molecular analyses. In previous work, we described changes in protein expression induced in hippocampus and cortex in control mice after exposure to context fear conditioning (CFC), with and without memantine treatment. Here, we extend this analysis to Ts65Dn mice, measuring levels of 85 proteins/protein modifications, including components of MAP kinase and MTOR pathways, and subunits of NMDA receptors, in cortex and hippocampus of Ts65Dn mice after failed learning in CFC and after learning was rescued by memantine. We show that, compared with wild type littermate controls, (i) of the dynamic responses seen in control mice in normal learning, >40% also occur in Ts65Dn in failed learning or are compensated by baseline abnormalities, and thus are considered necessary but not sufficient for successful learning, and (ii) treatment with memantine does not in general normalize the initial protein levels but instead induces direct and indirect responses in approximately half the proteins measured and results in normalization of the endpoint protein levels. Together, these datasets provide a first view of the complexities associated with pharmacological rescue of learning in the Ts65Dn. Extending such studies to additional drugs and mouse models of DS will aid in identifying pharmacotherapies for effective clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.