Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25793379›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Sepsis induces specific changes in histone modification patterns in human monocytes.

Sebastian Weiterer, Florian Uhle, Christoph Lichtenstern, Benedikt H Siegler, Sabin Bhuju, Michael Jarek, Marek Bartkuhn, Markus A Weigand

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Emerging therapeutic targets for sepsis.Expert opinion on therapeutic targets · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sebastian WeitererDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Giessen-Marburg-Langen, Giessen, Germany.
Florian UhleDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christoph LichtensternDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Benedikt H SieglerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sabin BhujuGenome Analytics, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
Michael JarekGenome Analytics, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
Marek BartkuhnInstitute for Genetics, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany.
Markus A WeigandDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Giessen-Marburg-Langen, Giessen, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEHelmholtz Centre for Infection Research · DEJustus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis is a global burden and the primary cause of death in intensive care units worldwide. The pathophysiological changes induced by the host's systemic inflammatory response to infection are not yet fully understood. During sepsis, the immune system is confronted with a variety of factors, which are integrated within the individual cells and result in changes of their basal state of responsiveness. Epigenetic mechanisms like histone modifications are known to participate in the control of immune reactions, but so far the situation during sepsis is unknown. METHODS AND

findingsIn a pilot approach, we performed combined chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by high-throughput sequencing to assess the genome-wide distribution of the chromatin modifications histone 3 lysine 4 and 27 trimethylation and lysine 9 acetylation in monocytes isolated from healthy donors (n = 4) and patients with sepsis (n = 2). Despite different underlying causes for sepsis, a comparison over promoter regions shows a high correlation between the patients for all chromatin marks. These findings hold true also when comparing patients to healthy controls. Despite the global similarity, differential analysis reveals a set of distinct promoters with significant enrichment or depletion of histone marks. Further analysis of overrepresented GO terms show an enrichment of genes involved in immune function. To the most prominent ones belong different members of the HLA family located within the MHC cluster together with the gene coding for the major regulator of this locus-CIITA.

conclusionsWe are able to show for the first time that sepsis in humans induces selective and precise changes of chromatin modifications in distinct promoter regions of immunologically relevant genes, shedding light on basal regulatory mechanisms that might be contributing to the functional changes occurring in monocytes.

Indexed as

Protein Processing, Post-TranslationalCase-Control StudiesChromatinChromatin ImmunoprecipitationCluster AnalysisHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIHistonesHumansMonocytesPromoter Regions, GeneticReceptors, Interleukin-1 Type IISepsisChromatinHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIHistonesIL1R2 protein, humanReceptors, Interleukin-1 Type II

Identifiers

PMID25793379
PMCPMC4368631
OpenAlexW1969360465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.