ArticleSpringerPlus2015
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcomes in a cancer center emergency department.
Article in SpringerPlus, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Resuscitation outcomes in patients with cancer: experience in a large urban cancer centre.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2023Article
- The feasibility of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for patients with active cancer who undergo in-hospital cardiac arrest.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Treatment Limitation Decisions in Critically Ill Patients With a Malignancy on the Intensive Care Unit.Journal of intensive care medicine · 2021Article
- The required competencies of physicians within palliative care from the perspectives of multi-professional expert groups: a qualitative study.BMC palliative care · 2020Article
- Outcome of stage IV cancer patients receiving in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a population-based cohort study.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Changes in attitudes towards hastened death among Finnish physicians over the past sixteen years.BMC medical ethics · 2018Article
- Patterns of Resuscitation Care and Survival After In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Patients With Advanced Cancer.Journal of oncology practice · 2017Article
- Do-not-resuscitate orders in cancer patients: a review of literature.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017Review
- The association between hemoglobin concentration and neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest.Journal of critical care · 2016Observational
- Does Decision-making in End-of-life Care Differ Between Graduating Medical Students and Experienced Physicians?In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) after cardiac arrest is utilized indiscriminately among unselected populations. Cancer patients have particularly low rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival to hospital discharge after CPR. Our study determines rates of ROSC and survival to hospital discharge among cancer patients undergoing CPR in our cancer center. We examined whether these rates have changed over the past decade.
methodsThis IRB-approved retrospective observational study was conducted in our cancer center. The ED and cancer center provide medical care for ≥ 115,000 patients annually. Cases of CPR presenting to the cancer center for years 2003-2012 were identified using Institutional CPR and Administrative Data for Resuscitation and Billing databases. Age, gender, ethnicity, ROSC and Discharge Alive using a modified Utsein template was used to compare proportions achieving ROSC and survival to hospital discharge for two time periods: 2003-2007 (Group 1) and 2008-2012 (Group 2), using traditional Pearson chi-square statistics.
resultsOne hundred twenty-six cancer center patients received CPR from 2003-2012. Group 1 (N = 64) and Group 2 (N = 62) were similar; age (60 vs. 60 years), gender (63% vs. 58% male), and race/ethnicity (67% vs. 56% White). Proportions achieving ROSC were similar in the two time periods (36% Group 1 vs. 45% Group 2, OR = 1.47, 95% CI 0.72 - 3.00) as was survival to hospital discharge (11% Group 1 vs. 10% Group 2, OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.28 - 2.76).
conclusionsROSC after CPR in cancer patients and survival to hospital discharge did not change over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.