Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25792817›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2015

Impact of patient programs on adherence and persistence in inflammatory and immunologic diseases: a meta-analysis.

Chakkarin Burudpakdee, Zeba M Khan, Smeet Gala, Merena Nanavaty, Satyin Kaura

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07145983 (Peer Support Intervention Effect on Medication Adherence, Self-care and Knowledge Among Patients With Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07145983 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Peer Support Intervention Effect on Medication Adherence, Self-care and Knowledge Among Patients With Diabetes: A Randomized Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAddis Ababa UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled120ConditionsPeer Influence, Medication Adherence, Self CareArmsStructured Diabetes Education on medication Adherence and self care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chakkarin BurudpakdeeMarket Access Solutions, LLC, Raritan, NJ, USA ; University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Zeba M KhanCelgene Corporation, Summit, NJ, USA.
Smeet GalaMarket Access Solutions, LLC, Raritan, NJ, USA.
Merena NanavatyMarket Access Solutions, LLC, Raritan, NJ, USA.
Satyin KauraCelgene Corporation, Summit, NJ, USA.
University of North Carolina at Charlotte · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPatient adherence and persistence is important to improve outcomes in chronic conditions, including inflammatory and immunologic (I&I) diseases. Patient programs that aim at improving medication adherence or persistence play an essential role in optimizing care. This meta-analysis assessed the effectiveness of patient programs in the therapeutic area of I&I diseases.

methodsA global systematic literature review was conducted with inclusion criteria of: patient programs in I&I diseases; published in English language between January 2008 and September 2013; and reporting measures of adherence or persistence, including medication possession ratio >80% and persistence rate. A meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model. Subgroup analyses based on the type of program was performed whenever feasible.

resultsOf 67 studies reviewed for eligibility, a total of 17 studies qualified for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Overall, patient programs increased adherence (odds ratio [OR]=2.48, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.68-3.64, P<0.00001) as compared with standard of care. Combination patient programs that used both informational and behavioral strategies were superior in improving adherence (OR=3.68, 95% CI=2.20-6.16, P<0.00001) compared with programs that used only informational (OR=2.16, 95% CI=1.36-3.44, P=0.001) or only behavioral approaches (OR=1.85, 95% CI=1.00-3.45, P=0.05). Additionally, patients were more likely to be persistent (OR=2.26, 95% CI=1.16-4.39, P=0.02) in the intervention group as compared with the control group. Persistence (in days) was significantly (P=0.007) longer, by 42 additional days, in the intervention group than in the control group.

conclusionsPatient programs can significantly improve adherence as well as persistence in the therapeutic area of I&I diseases. Programs employing a multimodal approach are more effective in improving adherence than programs with informational or behavioral strategies alone. This in turn may improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

behavioralinformationalpatient interventionssystematic literature review

Identifiers

PMID25792817
PMCPMC4364594
OpenAlexW2015773910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.