Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25792664›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias2015

The Italian validation of the Anosognosia Questionnaire for Dementia in Alzheimer's disease.

G Gambina, V Valbusa, N Corsi, F Ferrari, F Sala, E Broggio, M T Condoleo, V Surdo, P Errera, A C Cagnin and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Psychometrics, diagnostics and usability of Italian tools assessing behavioural and functional outcomes in neurological, geriatric and psychiatric disorders: a systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Comprehension of written texts for the assessment of clinical competence and decision making in people with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

G GambinaDepartment of Neuroscience, Alzheimer's Disease Center, Neurology d.O., University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy gambina.giuseppe@gmail.com.
V ValbusaDepartment of Neuroscience, Alzheimer's Disease Center, Neurology d.O., University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy.
N CorsiDepartment of Neuroscience, Alzheimer's Disease Center, Neurology d.O., University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy.
F FerrariDepartment of Neuroscience, Alzheimer's Disease Center, Neurology d.O., University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy.
F SalaDepartment of Neuroscience, Alzheimer's Disease Center, Neurology d.O., University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy.
E BroggioDepartment of Neuroscience, Alzheimer's Disease Center, Neurology d.O., University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy.
M T CondoleoDepartment of Neuroscience, Alzheimer's Disease Center, Neurology d.O., University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy.
V SurdoPsychogeriatric and Alzheimer Unit, ASP Trapani, Trapani, Italy.
P ErreraPsychogeriatric and Alzheimer Unit, ASP Trapani, Trapani, Italy.
A C CagninDepartment of Neuroscience, Neurology Clinic, University Medical School of Padova, Padova, Italy.
G MorettoDepartment of Neuroscience, Alzheimer's Disease Center, Neurology d.O., University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy.
V MoroDepartment of Philosophy, Education and Psychology, NPSY.Lab-VR, University of Verona, Verona, Italy valentina.moro@univr.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the Anosognosia Questionnaire-Dementia (AQ-D) is one of the main instruments for assessing awareness in Alzheimer's disease (AD), the normative data were until now limited to people from Argentina and Japan. This study aims to validate this instrument in an European context, in particular in an Italian sample. In a multicenter project (Verona, Padova, and Trapani), 130 patients with AD and their caregivers participated in the study. Psychometric characteristics of AQ-D are confirmed indicating that the scale permits the early identification of anosognosia and the correct care management of patients. Indeed, anosognosia results to be present also in patients with very mild AD (moderate: 44.44%; mild: 47.17%; and very mild: 23.73%). Moreover, the results indicate that deficits in awareness may vary in severity and that different types of anosognosia may be identified.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAgnosiaAlzheimer DiseaseFemaleHumansItalyMalePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness Indexaffective anosognosiaAlzheimer’s diseaseamnestic anosognosiaAQ-Dassessment of awarenessexecutive anosognosia

Identifiers

PMID25792664
PMCPMC10852577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.