Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25792551›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2015

QSLiMFinder: improved short linear motif prediction using specific query protein data.

Nicolas Palopoli, Kieren T Lythgow, Richard J Edwards

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Computational Prediction of Linear Interacting Peptides.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Computational prediction of disordered binding regions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicolas PalopoliCentre for Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Kieren T LythgowCentre for Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK, Public Health England, London, UK.
Richard J EdwardsCentre for Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK, Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK and School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I006230/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationThe sensitivity of de novo short linear motif (SLiM) prediction is limited by the number of patterns (the motif space) being assessed for enrichment. QSLiMFinder uses specific query protein information to restrict the motif space and thereby increase the sensitivity and specificity of predictions.

resultsQSLiMFinder was extensively benchmarked using known SLiM-containing proteins and simulated protein interaction datasets of real human proteins. Exploiting prior knowledge of a query protein likely to be involved in a SLiM-mediated interaction increased the proportion of true positives correctly returned and reduced the proportion of datasets returning a false positive prediction. The biggest improvement was seen if a short region of the query protein flanking the interaction site was known. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All the tools and data used in this study, including QSLiMFinder and the SLiMBench benchmarking software, are freely available under a GNU license as part of SLiMSuite, at: http://bioware.soton.ac.uk.

Indexed as

Protein Interaction Domains and MotifsAlgorithmsAmino Acid MotifsHumansProtein Interaction MappingSequence Analysis, ProteinSoftware

Identifiers

PMID25792551
PMCPMC4495300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.