Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25792263›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2015

Organs-on-chips at the frontiers of drug discovery.

Eric W Esch, Anthony Bahinski, Dongeun Huh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 468 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
468citing papers in PubMed
72.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

468 citing papers in PubMed, 1,150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

408 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eric W EschDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
Anthony BahinskiWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Dongeun HuhDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES013508 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Trevor M Penning · 2006 to 2026
$35.3M
Probing the physics of chronic lung disease using microphysiological biomimicryDP2HL127720 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HUH, DONGEUN · 2014 to 2014
$2.4M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS 1DP2HL127720-01NHLBI NIH HHS DP2 HL127720NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES013508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving the effectiveness of preclinical predictions of human drug responses is critical to reducing costly failures in clinical trials. Recent advances in cell biology, microfabrication and microfluidics have enabled the development of microengineered models of the functional units of human organs - known as organs-on-chips - that could provide the basis for preclinical assays with greater predictive power. Here, we examine the new opportunities for the application of organ-on-chip technologies in a range of areas in preclinical drug discovery, such as target identification and validation, target-based screening, and phenotypic screening. We also discuss emerging drug discovery opportunities enabled by organs-on-chips, as well as important challenges in realizing the full potential of this technology.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationAnimalsDrug DiscoveryDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrug IndustryHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansModels, BiologicalPharmacokineticsRare Diseases

Identifiers

PMID25792263
PMCPMC4826389
OpenAlexW2010546163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.