Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25792207›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2015

Impact of early nutrition and feeding route on outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients with shock: a post hoc marginal structural model study.

Jean Reignier, Michael Darmon, Romain Sonneville, Anne-Laure Borel, Maité Garrouste-Orgeas, Stéphane Ruckly, Bertrand Souweine, Anne-Sylvie Dumenil, Hakim Haouache, Christophe Adrie and 10 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Treatment and Management ofInfection and drug resistance · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nutritional Support in Coronavirus 2019 Disease.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Jean ReignierMedical-Surgical Intensive Care Unit, CHD de la Vendée, La Roche-sur-Yon, France, jean.reignier@chd-vendee.fr.
Michael Darmon
Romain Sonneville
Anne-Laure Borel
Maité Garrouste-Orgeas
Stéphane Ruckly
Bertrand Souweine
Anne-Sylvie Dumenil
Hakim Haouache
Christophe Adrie
Laurent Argaud
Lilia Soufir
Guillaume Marcotte
Virginie Laurent
Dany Goldgran-Toledano
Christophe Clec'h
Carole Schwebel
Elie Azoulay
Jean-François Timsit
OutcomeRea Network
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRHôpital André Mignot · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRCentre Hospitalier de Gonesse · FRCentre Hospitalier Départemental Vendée · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne · FRHôpital Antoine-Béclère · FRHôpitaux Universitaires Henri-Mondor · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFew data are available about optimal nutrition modalities in mechanically ventilated patients with shock. Our objective was to assess associations linking early nutrition (<48 h after intubation), feeding route and calorie intake to mortality and risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in patients with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and shock.

methodsIn the prospective OutcomeRea database, we identified adults with IMV >72 h and shock (arterial systolic pressure <90 mmHg) within 48 h after intubation. A marginal structural Cox model was used to create a pseudo-population in which treatment was unconfounded by subject-specific characteristics.

resultsWe included 3,032 patients. Early nutrition was associated with lower day-28 mortality [HR 0.89, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.81-0.98, P = 0.01] and day-7 mortality (HR 0.76, CI 0.66-0.87, P < 0.001) but not with lower day-7 to day-28 mortality (HR 1.00, CI 0.89-1.12, P = 0.98). Early nutrition increased VAP risk over the 28 days (HR 1.08, CI 1.00-1.17, P = 0.046) and until day 7 (HR 7.17, CI 6.27-8.19, P < 0.001) but decreased VAP risk from days 7 to 28 (HR 0.85, CI 0.78-0.92, P < 0.001). Compared to parenteral feeding, enteral feeding was associated with a slightly increased VAP risk (HR 1.11, CI 1.00-1.22, P = 0.04) but not with mortality. Neither mortality nor VAP risk differed between early calorie intakes of ≥20 and <20 kcal/kg/day.

conclusionIn mechanically ventilated patients with shock, early nutrition was associated with reduced mortality. Neither feeding route nor early calorie intake was associated with mortality. Early nutrition and enteral feeding were associated with increased VAP risk.

Indexed as

AdultAgedEnteral NutritionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMortalityNutritional StatusParenteral NutritionPneumonia, Ventilator-AssociatedProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRespiration, ArtificialShockTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID25792207
OpenAlexW1972514465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.