Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25792203›Full record

ReviewIntensive care medicine2015

Preventive and therapeutic strategies in critically ill patients with highly resistant bacteria.

Matteo Bassetti, Jan J De Waele, Philippe Eggimann, Josè Garnacho-Montero, Gunnar Kahlmeter, Francesco Menichetti, David P Nicolau, Jose Arturo Paiva, Mario Tumbarello, Tobias Welte and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Intensive care medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Review of the 100 Most Cited Articles inEuropean burn journal · 2025
    Review
  5. Antibiotic Resistance toJournal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. High Frequency ofInfection & chemotherapy · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Matteo BassettiInfectious Diseases Division, Santa Maria Misericordia University Hospital, Udine, Italy, mattba@tin.it.
Jan J De Waele
Philippe Eggimann
Josè Garnacho-Montero
Gunnar Kahlmeter
Francesco Menichetti
David P Nicolau
Jose Arturo Paiva
Mario Tumbarello
Tobias Welte
Mark Wilcox
Jean Ralph Zahar
Garyphallia Poulakou

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The antibiotic pipeline continues to diminish and the majority of the public remains unaware of this critical situation. The cause of the decline of antibiotic development is multifactorial and currently most ICUs are confronted with the challenge of multidrug-resistant organisms. Antimicrobial multidrug resistance is expanding all over the world, with extreme and pandrug resistance being increasingly encountered, especially in healthcare-associated infections in large highly specialized hospitals. Antibiotic stewardship for critically ill patients translated into the implementation of specific guidelines, largely promoted by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, targeted at education to optimize choice, dosage, and duration of antibiotics in order to improve outcomes and reduce the development of resistance. Inappropriate antimicrobial therapy, meaning the selection of an antibiotic to which the causative pathogen is resistant, is a consistent predictor of poor outcomes in septic patients. Therefore, pharmacokinetically/pharmacodynamically optimized dosing regimens should be given to all patients empirically and, once the pathogen and susceptibility are known, local stewardship practices may be employed on the basis of clinical response to redefine an appropriate regimen for the patient. This review will focus on the most severely ill patients, for whom substantial progress in organ support along with diagnostic and therapeutic strategies markedly increased the risk of nosocomial infections.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCritical IllnessCross InfectionDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialHumansSepsisAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID25792203
PMCPMC7080151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.