Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25791915›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of psychotraumatology2015

Therapeutic adherence and competence scales for Developmentally Adapted Cognitive Processing Therapy for adolescents with PTSD.

Jana Gutermann, Franziska Schreiber, Simone Matulis, Ulrich Stangier, Rita Rosner, Regina Steil

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of psychotraumatology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Choosing the right instruments for psychotrauma related research.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2015
    Article
  11. Development and Initial Psychometrics for a Therapist Competence Instrument for CBT for Youth Anxiety.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jana GutermannDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; gutermann@psych.uni-frankfurt.de.
Franziska SchreiberDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Simone MatulisDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Ulrich StangierDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Rita RosnerDepartment of Clinical and Biological Psychology, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Eichstätt, Germany.
Regina SteilDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DECatholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background : The assessment of therapeutic adherence and competence is often neglected in psychotherapy research, particularly in children and adolescents; however, both variables are crucial for the interpretation of treatment effects. Objective : Our aim was to develop, adapt, and pilot two scales to assess therapeutic adherence and competence in a recent innovative program, Developmentally Adapted Cognitive Processing Therapy (D-CPT), for adolescents suffering from posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after childhood abuse. Method : Two independent raters assessed 30 randomly selected sessions involving 12 D-CPT patients (age 13-20 years, M age=16.75, 91.67% female) treated by 11 therapists within the pilot phase of a multicenter study. Results : Three experts confirmed the relevance and appropriateness of each item. All items and total scores for adherence (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICC]=0.76-1.00) and competence (ICC=0.78-0.98) yielded good to excellent inter-rater reliability. Cronbach's alpha was 0.59 for the adherence scale and 0.96 for the competence scale. Conclusions : The scales reliably assess adherence and competence in D-CPT for adolescent PTSD patients. The ratings can be helpful in the interpretation of treatment effects, the assessment of mediator variables, and the identification and training of therapeutic skills that are central to achieving good treatment outcomes. Both adherence and competence will be assessed as possible predictor variables for treatment success in future D-CPT trials.

Indexed as

adolescentsCognitive Processing TherapyD-CPTPTSDtherapeutic adherencetherapeutic competencetreatment integrity

Identifiers

PMID25791915
PMCPMC4366479
OpenAlexW2061479522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.