Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25791782›Full record

ReviewNeuroImage2015

Miniaturized optical neuroimaging in unrestrained animals.

Hang Yu, Janaka Senarathna, Betty M Tyler, Nitish V Thakor, Arvind P Pathak

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NeuroImage, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Where do we stand on fMRI in awake mice?Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Naturalistic neuroscience and virtual reality.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Wireless optoelectronic photometers for monitoring neuronal dynamics in the deep brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hang YuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Janaka SenarathnaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Betty M TylerDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Nitish V ThakorDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Arvind P PathakRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA. Electronic address: pathak@mri.jhu.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

A Wireless Laser Speckle and Fluorescence Imager for In vivo Brain Tumor ImagingR21CA175784 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PATHAK, ARVIND P · 2013 to 2014
$380k
NCI NIH HHS NCI 1R21CA175784-01NCI NIH HHS R21 CA175784
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The confluence of technological advances in optics, miniaturized electronic components and the availability of ever increasing and affordable computational power have ushered in a new era in functional neuroimaging, namely, an era in which neuroimaging of cortical function in unrestrained and unanesthetized rodents has become a reality. Traditional optical neuroimaging required animals to be anesthetized and restrained. This greatly limited the kinds of experiments that could be performed in vivo. Now one can assess blood flow and oxygenation changes resulting from functional activity and image functional response in disease models such as stroke and seizure, and even conduct long-term imaging of tumor physiology, all without the confounding effects of anesthetics or animal restraints. These advances are shedding new light on mammalian brain organization and function, and helping to elucidate loss of this organization or 'dysfunction' in a wide array of central nervous system disease models. In this review, we highlight recent advances in the fabrication, characterization and application of miniaturized head-mounted optical neuroimaging systems pioneered by innovative investigators from a wide array of disciplines. We broadly classify these systems into those based on exogenous contrast agents, such as single- and two-photon microscopy systems; and those based on endogenous contrast mechanisms, such as multispectral or laser speckle contrast imaging systems. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of these approaches along with a perspective on the future of this exciting new frontier in neuroimaging.

Indexed as

MiniaturizationAnimalsBrainContrast MediaEquipment DesignFunctional NeuroimagingMicroscopyRodentiaContrast MediaAwakeFreely movingHead-mountedImagingMiniaturizedOpticalTetherlessUnanesthetized

Identifiers

PMID25791782
PMCPMC5538377
OpenAlexW2024182879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.