Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25791436›Full record

ArticleMedical image analysis2015

Large-scale automatic reconstruction of neuronal processes from electron microscopy images.

Verena Kaynig, Amelio Vazquez-Reina, Seymour Knowles-Barley, Mike Roberts, Thouis R Jones, Narayanan Kasthuri, Eric Miller, Jeff Lichtman, Hanspeter Pfister

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image analysis, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Volume electron microscopy.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2022
    Article
  6. Modeling Neurons in 3D at the Nanoscale.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  7. Emerging electron microscopy and 3D methodologies to interrogate Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in murine models.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Verena KaynigSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, United States.
Amelio Vazquez-ReinaSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, United States; Department of Computer Science at Tufts University, United States.
Seymour Knowles-BarleyDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, United States.
Mike RobertsSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, United States.
Thouis R JonesSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, United States; Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, United States.
Narayanan KasthuriDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, United States.
Eric MillerDepartment of Computer Science at Tufts University, United States.
Jeff LichtmanDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, United States.
Hanspeter PfisterSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, United States.

Funding

Res Support CoreP50MH094271 · NIMH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI HENSCH, TAKAO K · 2011 to 2022
$18.6M
High Resolution Connectomics of Mammalian Neural CircuitsR01NS076467 · NINDS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI LICHTMAN, JEFF W, MEISTER, MARKUS · 2011 to 2015
$9.4M
Scalable Software for Reverse Engineering Neural Circuits from HistologyR44MH088088 · NIMH · KITWARE, INC. · PI LAW, CHRISTOPHER CHARLES · 2012 to 2013
$986k
NIMH NIH HHS 2R44MH088088-03NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH094271NIMH NIH HHS R44 MH088088NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS076467NINDS NIH HHS R01NS076467
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automated sample preparation and electron microscopy enables acquisition of very large image data sets. These technical advances are of special importance to the field of neuroanatomy, as 3D reconstructions of neuronal processes at the nm scale can provide new insight into the fine grained structure of the brain. Segmentation of large-scale electron microscopy data is the main bottleneck in the analysis of these data sets. In this paper we present a pipeline that provides state-of-the art reconstruction performance while scaling to data sets in the GB-TB range. First, we train a random forest classifier on interactive sparse user annotations. The classifier output is combined with an anisotropic smoothing prior in a Conditional Random Field framework to generate multiple segmentation hypotheses per image. These segmentations are then combined into geometrically consistent 3D objects by segmentation fusion. We provide qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the automatic segmentation and demonstrate large-scale 3D reconstructions of neuronal processes from a 27,000 μm(3) volume of brain tissue over a cube of 30 μm in each dimension corresponding to 1000 consecutive image sections. We also introduce Mojo, a proofreading tool including semi-automated correction of merge errors based on sparse user scribbles.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBrainImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMachine LearningMicroscopy, ElectronNeuronsPattern Recognition, AutomatedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySubtraction TechniqueLarge-scale neuron reconstructionProofreadingRandom forestSegmentation fusionSerial section electron microscopy

Identifiers

PMID25791436
PMCPMC4406409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.