ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2015
Web-based self-reported height, weight, and body mass index among Swedish adolescents: a validation study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Accuracy of parent- and self-reported height and weight data in children: a systematic review.European journal of public health · 2026Pooled it
- Obesity and Psychopathology From Childhood to Adolescence: A Systematic Review of Prospective Studies.Actas espanolas de psiquiatria · 2025Pooled it
- Reliability of Self-Reported Height and Weight in Children: A School-Based Cross-Sectional Study and a Review.Nutrients · 2022Pooled it
- How accurate is the prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents derived from self-reported data? A meta-analysis.Public health nutrition · 2018Pooled it
- High BMI and low cardiorespiratory fitness in adolescence are associated with increased risk of severe bacterial infections in adulthood.Journal of internal medicine · 2026Article
- Discrepancies and potential impacts of self-reported versus measured height and weight on adult transthoracic echocardiography findings.Echo research and practice · 2025Article
- Somatization and Body Composition: Findings from a Cross-Sectional Study on Non-Clinical Young Adults.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Twelve-month analysis of real-world evidence from a telehealth obesity-treatment provider using antiobesity medications.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2024Observational
- Validity of self-reported weight and height among female young adults in the United Arab Emirates.PloS one · 2024Article
- Sports Practice, Body Image Perception, and Factors Involved in Sporting Activity in Italian Schoolchildren.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Neighborhood deprivation, built environment, and overweight in adolescents in the city of Oslo.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Agreement between measured weight, height and BMI and Web-based self-reported data in participants of the 1993 Pelotas Birth Cohort, Brazil: a cross-sectional validation study.Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil · 2023Article
- Agreement Between Clinically Measured Weight and Self-reported Weight Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Through an mHealth Lifestyle Coaching Program in Denmark: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- Regional Adolescent Obesity and Overweight Status in Korea from 2018-2019: Comparison between Two Data Sources.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Accuracy of self-reported birth outcomes relative to birth certificate data in an Internet-based prospective cohort study.Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2021Article
- The relationship between food addiction and patterns of disordered eating with exercise dependence: in amateur endurance athletes.Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2020Article
- The Accuracy of Self-Reported Body Weight Is High but Dependent on Recent Weight Change and Negative Affect in Teenage Girls.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- The PRIDE Study: Evaluation of online methods of data collection.Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2020Article
- Intake of Caffeine and Its Association with Physical and Mental Health Status among University Students in Bahrain.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Dieting, body weight concerns and health: trends and associations in Swedish schoolchildren.BMC public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWeb-collected height and weight are increasingly used in epidemiological studies; however, the validity has rarely been evaluated.
objectiveThe aim of the study was to validate self-reported height, weight, and corresponding body mass index (BMI) among Swedish adolescents aged approximately 16 years. A secondary aim was to investigate possible prediction factors for validity of self-reported BMI.
methodsThe study included 1698 adolescents from the population-based cohort BAMSE. Height and weight were collected through a Web-based questionnaire and subsequently measured using standard procedures. Differences between reported and measured height, weight, and corresponding BMI were compared by t tests and agreement was evaluated by Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman plots. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to investigate whether lifestyle and demographic factors predicted validity of self-reported BMI.
resultsOn average, weight was underestimated by 1.1 kg and height was overestimated by 0.5 cm, leading to an underestimation of BMI by 0.5 kg/m2. Correlation coefficients were .98 for height, .97 for weight, and .94 for BMI, and highly significant. Females underestimated weight to a higher extent than males and overweight and obese participants underestimated weight to a higher extent than normal-weight participants, which resulted in higher underestimation of BMI. Underweight participants, on the contrary, overestimated weight and correspondingly BMI. Overall, a high proportion of participants were classified into the correct BMI category; however, among overweight and obese participants, only 60.2% (139/231) and 46% (20/44) were correctly classified, respectively. In the multivariable prediction model, only gender and BMI status significantly predicted discrepancy between reported and measured BMI.
conclusionsWeb-collected BMI may be used as a valid, quick, and cost-effective alternative to measured BMI among Swedish adolescents. The accuracy of self-reported BMI declines with increasing BMI and self-reported BMI should not be used to estimate the prevalence of overweight or obesity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.