Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25790819›Full record

SynthesisBritish medical bulletin2015

Phenoxy herbicides, soft-tissue sarcoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review of evidence from cohort and case-control studies.

Nimeshi Jayakody, E Clare Harris, David Coggon

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British medical bulletin, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Cancer and occupational exposure to pesticides: an umbrella review.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Current-use pesticide exposures in remote Inuit communities.International journal of circumpolar health · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nimeshi JayakodyMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
E Clare HarrisMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
David CoggonMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK dnc@mrc.soton.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1018Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhenoxy herbicides have been used widely in agriculture, forestry, parks and domestic gardens. Early studies linked them with soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), but when last reviewed by the International Agency for Research on Cancer in 1986, the evidence for human carcinogenicity was limited. SOURCES OF DATA: We searched Medline and Embase, looking for cohort or case-control studies that provided data on risk of STS and/or NHL in relation to phenoxy herbicides, and checked the reference lists of relevant publications for papers that had been missed. AREAS OF AGREEMENT, AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: The extensive evidence is not entirely consistent, and a hazard of STS or NHL cannot firmly be ruled out. However, if there is a hazard, then absolute risks must be small. GROWING POINTS, AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: Extended follow-up of previously assembled cohorts may be the most efficient way of further reducing uncertainties.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesCohort StudiesHerbicidesHumansLymphoma, Non-HodgkinOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureRisk AssessmentSarcomaHerbicides2,4,5-T2,4-DcancerepidemiologyMCPAMCPP

Identifiers

PMID25790819
PMCPMC4548713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.