Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25790800›Full record

ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2015

Antiplatelet treatment in essential hypertension: where do we stand?

Eugenia Gkaliagkousi, Eleni Gavriilaki, Stella Douma

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hypertension reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eugenia Gkaliagkousi2nd Propedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Eleni Gavriilaki
Stella Douma
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRPapageorgiou General Hospital · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antiplatelet agents represent a cornerstone in the management of patients at increased cardiovascular risk. Essential hypertension is considered a major public health problem leading to increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The majority of patients with essential hypertension exhibit also additional cardiovascular risk factors and present with increased platelet activation. Despite recent innovations in the field of antiplatelet treatment and the introduction of novel agents, the role of antiplatelet treatment in patients with essential hypertension remains understudied. This review aims to shed light on novel experimental and clinical data in the evolving field of antiplatelet treatment in essential hypertension. In particular, recent data regarding aspirin, clopidogrel, novel P2Y12 inhibitors, and other agents with potential antiplatelet effects are critically reviewed.

Indexed as

AnimalsCardiovascular DiseasesEssential HypertensionHumansHypertensionPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPurinergic P2Y Receptor AntagonistsReceptors, Purinergic P2Y12Risk FactorsP2RY12 protein, humanPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPurinergic P2Y Receptor AntagonistsReceptors, Purinergic P2Y12

Identifiers

PMID25790800
OpenAlexW1967085179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.